VirusTotal
9 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Finance Instants Pay”
انتحال Mastercard: duplicate-disabled-280.invalid — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 9/95 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, Forcepoint…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
9 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرPage capture
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain is flagged as an elevated-risk brand impersonation threat designed to deceive users into disclosing sensitive financial information by mimicking Mastercard’s official branding. The fraudulent site, titled 'Finance Instants Pay,' leverages social engineering tactics to exploit trust in the targeted financial services provider, increasing the likelihood of credential theft or unauthorized transactions. Infrastructure analysis reveals multiple high-risk indicators. The domain was registered on June 08, 2025, through OwnRegistrar, Inc., a registrar frequently associated with suspicious registrations. It resolves to IP address 192.3.190.186, hosted on AS36352 (HostPapa) in the United States, with no SSL certificate present. Security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the domain at a 9/95 detection rate, while it appears on at least one security blocklist. The site was subsequently taken offline, though its temporary availability posed a significant risk to unsuspecting users. Mitigation steps for brand impersonation threats include immediate verification of domain authenticity before entering credentials. Users should cross-reference official communication channels for legitimate URLs and enable multi-factor authentication on financial accounts. Organizations should monitor for newly registered domains containing their brand names and implement DNS-based blocking for known malicious indicators. Security teams are advised to conduct retrospective analysis of network logs for connections to 192.3.190.186 or related domains to identify potential compromise.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.webproserver.comdns2.webproserver.comnullLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-280.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by New
duplicate-disabled-280.invalid
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source9/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-280.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-280.invalid)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.