VirusTotal
1 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“City Trades Global”
انتحال Across: duplicate-disabled-27.invalid — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 1/95 (SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 55/100. مسجّل النطاق: Hostinger.
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
1 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرPage capture
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, www.citytradeglobal.com, is actively engaged in brand impersonation targeting Across, a recognized entity in the decentralized finance sector. The site presents itself as "City Trades Global," a fabricated identity designed to deceive users into believing it is affiliated with or endorsed by Across. As of the latest verification, the domain remains operational, posing an ongoing threat to individuals and organizations interacting with Across-related services. Analysis indicates that www.citytradeglobal.com was registered on May 8, 2025, through HOSTINGER operations, UAB. The domain resolves to the IP address 163.61.188.5, which is associated with AS153568 (NEW DHAKA HARDWARE) and geolocated in the United States. Security telemetry reveals that the domain has been flagged by 1 of 95 vendors on VirusTotal, a notably low detection rate that may reflect evasion techniques or recent activation. Additionally, the domain appears on one security blocklist and is currently unencrypted, lacking an SSL certificate. Infrastructure analysis further reveals that the domain is hosted on a provider commonly utilized for low-cost, short-term deployments, a pattern consistent with malicious operations. The risk posed by www.citytradeglobal.com is classified as high due to its active impersonation of Across, a trusted brand in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. The absence of encryption, recent registration date, and minimal blocklist presence suggest an attempt to evade detection while maximizing operational lifespan. Organizations and users are advised to implement the following mitigations: block the domain and its resolving IP (163.61.188.5) at the network perimeter; update endpoint protection rules to flag or quarantine any communications with this infrastructure; and conduct internal awareness training to educate personnel on recognizing brand impersonation tactics. Monitoring for similar domains registered through the same registrar or resolving to the same IP range is recommended to preemptively identify related threats.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.lytehosting.comdns2.lytehosting.comdns3.lytehosting.comdns4.lytehosting.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-27.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewC
duplicate-disabled-27.invalid
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-27.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-27.invalid)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.