VirusTotal
1 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Pi Blockchain, Community & Developer Platform | Pi Network”
انتحال Facebook: duplicate-disabled-1919.invalid — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 1/95 (SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 55/100. مسجّل النطاق…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
1 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain www.pi-network.org was observed on July 22, 2026 as an elevated‑risk brand‑impersonation site targeting Facebook. Registration data show the domain was created on February 20, 2025 and is registered through HOSTINGER operations, UAB, with authoritative nameservers ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com. DNS resolution points to IP address 88.223.84.10, which belongs to AS47583 Hostinger International Limited and is geolocated in the United States. No SSL certificate is presented for the host, and the domain is currently listed as offline.
The page title returned by the server is "Pi Blockchain, Community & Developer Platform | Pi Network," indicating that the site references the Pi cryptocurrency ecosystem rather than directly displaying Facebook branding. VirusTotal analysis recorded a single positive detection out of 95 scanned security vendors. Independent reputation services assign a Gridinsoft trust score of 0 out of 100, and the domain appears on one security blocklist, having been blocked by PhishDestroy.
The available intelligence classifies the activity as a crypto‑scam, but no additional payload or credential‑harvesting details have been disclosed. Defenders should continue to block the domain and its associated IP address at perimeter controls, monitor for re‑hosting attempts, and consider adding the host to internal threat‑intel feeds. Ongoing observation of related Hostinger‑hosted domains is advised, as the low trust score and single vendor flag suggest a nascent campaign that could evolve to incorporate more sophisticated phishing vectors.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0x376B8338F63A66F2872866b81a98983C27399420Format validated · Domain analysishttps://t.me/PiCoreChatStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-08-03 04:03:13 UTC
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-1919.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
duplicate-disabled-1919.invalid
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-1919.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-1919.invalid)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.