VirusTotal
18 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير“𝗗𝗔𝗡𝗔 | 𝗖𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗗𝗔𝗡𝗔”
انتحال DANA: dmpet.digital — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 18/95 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar); URLQuery 100 det.…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
18 / 95 engine detections
فتح التقرير100 det.
1/100
فتح التقريرضار
فتح التقريرchecked — no match recorded
16 community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain dmpet.digital has been identified as a brand impersonation threat specifically targeting DANA, a digital financial services platform. This domain was actively used in phishing operations designed to deceive users into disclosing sensitive credentials, payment details, or personal information under the guise of official customer support. Analysis confirms the domain is no longer resolving, though prior activity warrants close scrutiny. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered through Cloudflare, Inc. and resolved to the IP address 188.114.96.3, hosted on autonomous system AS13335. At the time of assessment, 18 of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal flagged dmpet.digital as malicious, indicating a high-confidence detection rate. The domain appeared on two security blocklists—PhishDestroy and PhishingDB—further corroborating its fraudulent nature. Notably, the page title, “DANA | Customer Care DANA,” employed Unicode stylization to mimic legitimate branding, a common tactic in phishing campaigns. No valid SSL certificate was present, increasing the likelihood of unencrypted data interception. Current status indicates the domain has been taken offline, reducing immediate exposure. However, the infrastructure and registration patterns suggest potential for re-emergence under similar domains. Organizations and users are advised to implement proactive monitoring for domains containing “dana” or related keywords, particularly those registered via Cloudflare or resolving to shared hosting environments. Network-level blocking of the IP 188.114.96.3 and associated CIDR ranges is recommended as a preventive measure. Security teams should also review logs for connections to this IP or domain to identify any prior compromise. End-users should be educated on recognizing Unicode-based spoofing in page titles and URLs, and encouraged to verify domain authenticity through official channels before entering credentials.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
josh.ns.cloudflare.comsuzanne.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='dmpet.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
dmpet.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/0182f037-a999-4303-bef1-6dbe74a3ea35
18/95 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source16 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcedmpet.digital
View sourceأبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 05/12/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
dmpet.digital)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.