VirusTotal
4 / 89 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Damus Airdrop | Phase 1”
أداة استنزاف محافظ العملات المشفرة: damus.network — آخر نشاط معروف (HTTP 200). ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 4/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, Fortinet…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
4 / 89 engine detections
فتح التقريرDBL_SPAM
1 community reference
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain damus.network was registered through Name.com, Inc on 18 December 2025. DNS resolution points to the IPv4 address 185.107.74.191, which is assigned to AS200430 (WEBO LLC) in Sweden. No TLS certificate was observed for the host, indicating that the site was served over plain HTTP. The public page title returned by the server is "Damus Airdrop | Phase 1", aligning with the reported phishing kit identified as an Airdrop Scam and the associated Angel Drainer payload.
VirusTotal analysis recorded detections by four of ninety‑three scanning engines, suggesting partial recognition by automated malware tools. The domain is listed on two external security blocklists and has been actively blocked by the PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer services. AlienVault OTX references the domain in a single threat‑intelligence pulse, and the Gridinsoft trust score registers at 0 out of 100, reflecting a high confidence of malicious intent.
The site is currently offline, but the infrastructure—including the name servers ns1crv.name.com, ns2dqr.name.com, ns3gxy.name.com, and ns4cfn.name.com—remains observable. Defenders should add damus.network to URL filtering and DNS blocklists, monitor the associated IP and name‑server patterns for related activity, and consider outreach to the registrar to request suspension. Continuous re‑scanning with multi‑vendor services is advised to capture any future changes in the domain’s behavior.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1crv.name.comns2dqr.name.comns3gxy.name.comns4cfn.name.comLocation describes the IP network.
1ad28295f1484202faab3b934c593e96f1e30966c7525cd4b3e2f3681b8d03f9Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
parked: raw=parked; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=Parking/1.0
damus.network
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
غير معروف→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
غير معروف→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
غير معروف→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
غير معروف→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
غير معروف→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
غير معروف→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
غير معروف→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
غير معروف→inactive
parked · parking_or_lifecycle_page
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/2b83b228-9cf8-4341-a54d-83ad8d4a6100
4/89 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcedamus.network
View source٥٢ نطاقًا متشابهًا محفوظًا
أبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 27/12/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا تفاعلت مع هذا المجال، أو أدخلت معلومات شخصية، أو قمت بالاتصال بمحفظة عملة مشفرة، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
يُقدَّر أن $51 billion تدفقت إلى محافظ عملات مشفرة غير مشروعة في عام 2024 (source). إذا كنت قد تفاعلت مع damus.network — تصرف الآن.
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
وفقًا لـ مكتب التحقيقات الفيدرالي (FBI)، وأهم التفاصيل هي بيانات المعاملات:
0x5856...35985)damus.network)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.