VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير“ChainList”
تصيد: daaps.digital — لم يتم التحقق منها. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 6/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Bfore.Ai PreCrime, CRDF, Fortinet, Gridinsoft); 3 external blocklist…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
6 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير11 community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقرير85/100
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of the domain daaps.digital indicates a phishing campaign targeting users of the ChainList platform, a known service in the cryptocurrency and decentralized application ecosystem. The domain was registered on July 13, 2025, through Web Commerce Communications Limited, a registrar frequently associated with abusive registrations. Infrastructure analysis reveals a single nameserver configuration, which may suggest efforts to centralize control or evade detection by security systems. As of July 24, 2026, the domain has been taken offline, though its prior activity remains a concern for defenders.
Detection metrics show limited but clear indications of malicious intent: three of ninety-five security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the domain as malicious, while four independent security blocklists—including PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, and Codeesura—have listed it as a threat. The page title 'ChainList' provides direct evidence of the intended deception, though the exact content and functionality of the phishing page remain unanalyzed due to its current offline status. Gridinsoft’s trust score of 0/100 further corroborates the domain’s high-risk classification. Defenders should treat this domain as part of a broader phishing infrastructure, particularly given its association with a recognizable brand in the decentralized finance space.
While the domain is no longer active, security teams are advised to monitor for re-registration or similar domains under the same registrar or nameserver patterns. Historical logs should be reviewed for connections to daaps.digital, and any detected interactions should be investigated for credential compromise or unauthorized transactions. The elevated risk level is justified by the combination of brand impersonation, blocklist presence, and low trust scores, despite the limited number of vendor detections.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
1Location describes the IP network.
d262f66c3f21dc00cefa81cdda78cced3e0c12bfe2a5631a362605481b6d77d5Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='daaps.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
daaps.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
redirected→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→redirected
http_redirect
غير معروف→redirected
http_redirect
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/3cea37b5-8a8a-455b-9ca3-c64291be5ac3
11 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source6/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourcedaaps.digital
View sourceأبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 23/08/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
daaps.digital)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.