VirusTotal
2 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Default Web Site Page”
نطاق في قوائم الحظر: crypto-card-access.online — آخر نشاط معروف (HTTP 200). ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 2/91 (Chong Lua Dao, Gridinsoft); URLQuery 1 alert…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
2 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير1 threat-system alert
فتح التقريرchecked — no match recorded
23 community references
فتح التقريرScan report
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | crypto-card-access.online |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
crypto-card-access.online is currently classified as a high‑risk generic phishing domain. The domain was registered on 2026-03-06 through NameCheap, Inc. and uses the default Namecheap hosting nameservers dns1.namecheaphosting.com and dns2.namecheaphosting.com. DNS resolution points to 184.94.213.125, an address owned by AS22612 (Namecheap) located in the United States. The site serves HTTP 200 responses and presents the page title “Default Web Site Page”. TLS termination is provided by a Sectigo RSA Domain Validation certificate issued by Sectigo Limited. Threat intelligence indicates the domain appears on three public blocklists and has been blocked by PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL. VirusTotal analysis shows that 2 of 94 security vendors flagged the domain, reinforcing the high‑risk assessment. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0/100, and the overall risk level is marked as high with an active status. The available data confirm the presence of phishing‑related infrastructure, but the specific payload, target audience, or compromised credentials have not been publicly disclosed. Defenders should add the domain and its IP address to outbound and inbound filtering rules, monitor DNS queries for the associated nameservers, and ensure that any traffic to the host is blocked at the perimeter. Continuous re‑evaluation is advised, as additional detections may emerge from further scanning or from victim reports.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns2.namecheaphosting.comLocation describes the IP network.
b2e87d90d3962b349e4806f599ff81b072f3e0141603ae866b417d347363b58fweb-hosting.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=LiteSpeed
crypto-card-access.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
غير معروف→live_content
content_served
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/11b11c71-995f-4158-8c59-5f49c4d2e0df
No threat flag
View source23 community references
View source2/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourcecrypto-card-access.online
View sourceأبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 06/03/2026
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
crypto-card-access.online)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.