VirusTotal
4 / 89 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Service Status”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
نطاق في قوائم الحظر: com-a.sbs — يمكن الوصول إليها · الوصول مقيد (HTTP 403). ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 4/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
4 / 89 engine detections
فتح التقرير1 threat-system alert
فتح التقرير4 community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | com-a.sbs |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
com-a.sbs is an impersonation phishing site that posed as a legitimate service under the title "Service Status." Its listing on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists points to crypto wallet users as the intended targets. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-09-17. The site has been offline since 2026-09-18, and its content was still blocked by the provider when last checked on 2026-10-19.
Domains that begin with "com-" are a common phishing trick. When a brand name is placed in front, the full address can read like an official ".com" site at a glance. A "Service Status" page fits this kind of lure. Victims are told about an outage, a pending verification or an account problem, then pushed to sign in, enter a recovery phrase or connect a wallet to "restore" access. Whatever they hand over goes straight to the operators. The page title itself names no brand and reads as a generic status notice, while we classify the site as impersonation phishing.
On 2026-09-17, 4 of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar and Webroot. That count is low, which is typical for a site caught within days of going live, before most vendors have seen it. Stronger backing comes from wallet-focused defenders. MetaMask and SEAL both blocklist the domain alongside PhishDestroy, and it appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. on 2026-09-15, only two days before PhishDestroy detected it. It went dark the following day, a short lifespan that suggests a disposable throwaway domain. Traffic ran through Cloudflare, Inc., which geolocates to Canada and hides the true origin server. The site used a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock icon said nothing about whether the site was legitimate.
If you entered a password on this site, change it on the real service and on any account that shares it, then turn on app-based 2FA. If you typed a seed phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and move your funds to a new wallet right away. If you connected a wallet or signed a transaction, review and revoke token approvals using a trusted approval checker. Defenders should block com-a.sbs and watch for other look-alike domains that start with "com-" across new top-level domains.
Last checked
The linked repository preserves daily zone observations across seven ShortDot-operated TLDs, including registration volume and abuse-related indicators. This registry context is supporting background and is not an independent detection for the domain in this report.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
david.ns.cloudflare.comelinore.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
4e1ace4b3c6a4d2cd4a28d980791bf44406334527cc3ca9fee2655bcc8e5e8bbSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of com-a.sbs · checked Sep 17, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
cloudflare_ban: raw=cf_phishing_block; http=403; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare; provider_error=cloudflare_phishing_interstitial
com-a.sbs
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
غير معروف→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
غير معروف→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
غير معروف→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
غير معروف→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
غير معروف→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
غير معروف→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
غير معروف→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
غير معروف→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
يمكن الوصول إليه→غير متوفر
2→4
يمكن الوصول إليه
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source4/89 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260917-EA0692
com-a.sbs
View sourcePage captured
View sourcePD-20260917-EA0692 Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
com-a.sbs)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.