VirusTotal
7 / 93 engine detections
فتح التقرير“Starknet (STRK) to Bounce Back? RSI Divergence Hinting at a Potential Upward Move”
انتحال Celer: app-stark.online — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 7/93 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Seclookup)…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
7 / 93 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرprovider verdict: clean
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرNo malicious flag
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
On July 24, 2026, analysis of the domain app-stark.online confirms a brand‑impersonation operation targeting the cryptocurrency platform celer. The site was registered on 22 December 2025 via HOSTINGER operations, UAB and resolves to the IPv4 address 92.113.16.248, which belongs to AS47583 (Hostinger International Limited) in Germany. DNS resolution is served by ns1.dns‑parking.com and ns2.dns‑parking.com, typical of parked or low‑cost hosting. No TLS certificate was observed, indicating that the site was delivered over plain HTTP. The only visible content indexed by security tools is the page title “Starknet (STRK) to Bounce Back?
RSI Divergence Hinting at a Potential Upward Move”, which appears unrelated to celer and suggests a content‑spoofing tactic aimed at attracting crypto‑interested users. Reputation checks show a Gridinsoft trust score of 0 / 100 and inclusion on a single security blocklist. The domain is listed as blocked by the PhishDestroy service, and 7 of 93 VirusTotal scanners flagged the host as malicious, reinforcing the suspicion of abuse. The site’s current HTTP status is offline, but the historical presence on blocklists indicates that it was previously reachable and active. Uncertainties remain regarding the exact payload delivered to visitors, as no SSL handshake, login page, or malware sample has been captured.
The limited number of detections suggests that the site may have been operational for a short window before takedown. Defenders should add app‑stark.online to network‑level deny lists, monitor outbound connections to 92.113.16.248, and flag any DNS queries to its parking nameservers. Because the registrar is Hostinger, future domains created under the same account should be scrutinised. Continuous re‑scanning of the IP address is advised to detect any resurgence of malicious content.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='app-stark.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
app-stark.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/634ffdff-2882-4a89-a20a-334308e9eade
7/93 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourceapp-stark.online
View sourceأبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 24/12/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
app-stark.online)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.