VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقرير“403 Forbidden”
إسقاط جوي مزيف: airdrop.blumcrypto.digital — المحتوى غير متوفر. ملخص الأدلة: VirusTotal 6/91 (BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet…
يبقى تحليل PhishDestroy AI المفصل أدناه باللغة الإنجليزية للحفاظ على السجل الجنائي الرقمي الأصلي.
6 / 91 engine detections
فتح التقريرno community references
فتح التقريرNo threat flag
فتح التقريرPage capture
فتح التقريرResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of airdrop.blumcrypto.digital, observed as offline on 25 July 2026, reveals multiple indicators consistent with a crypto‑drainer campaign that masquerades as a fake airdrop. The domain was registered on 21 February 2026 through Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc and uses the authoritative name servers ns100.webnic.cc and ns101.webnic.cc. DNS resolution points to the IP address 104.21.81.191, which belongs to AS13335 operated by Cloudflare, Inc., located in the United States. The SSL certificate presented is identified as “WE1”, but no further validation details are available. HTTP requests return a 403 Forbidden status and the page title is reported as “403 Forbidden”, indicating that the site is intentionally inaccessible, likely after takedown.
Reputation data shows the domain appears on two independent security blocklists. It is listed by PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer, both of which classify it as a fake‑airdrop scam. VirusTotal analysis recorded five detections out of ninety‑three scanned engines, reinforcing the malicious classification. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of zero out of one hundred, the lowest possible rating, which aligns with the other negative signals. No evidence of legitimate content or benign activity has been observed.
Uncertainty remains regarding the specific payload or transaction‑draining mechanisms that may have been hosted before the site was taken offline, as the 403 response prevents content inspection. No additional indicators such as malicious scripts, wallet addresses, or command‑and‑control endpoints have been disclosed. Consequently, defenders should treat any traffic to or from the resolved IP as suspicious, block the domain at the DNS or proxy layer, and monitor for similar naming patterns that combine “airdrop” with cryptocurrency‑related terms. Continuous re‑scanning of the domain, especially if it becomes active again, is advised to capture any evolving threats.
Last checked
For the registrable domain blumcrypto.digital behind this subdomain, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
لا تُنسب سمعة Edge-IP إلى هذا المجال.
ns101.webnic.ccLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='airdrop.blumcrypto.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConn
airdrop.blumcrypto.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
غير معروف→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
يمكن الوصول إليه→غير متوفر
6/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceairdrop.blumcrypto.digital
View sourceأبلغ عنه عضو واحد في المجتمع؛ شوهد أول مرة في 13/07/2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
إذا أدخلت بيانات اعتماد الحساب أو المعلومات الشخصية أو معلومات الدفع أو قمت بتنزيل ملف من هذا النطاق، فاتخذ إجراءً فوريًا. فيما يلي موارد لمساعدتك في الإبلاغ عن الحادث وحماية نفسك.
حدد بلدك للحصول على الاتصالات الرسمية المتعلقة بالجرائم الإلكترونية أو إنشاء مسودة شكوى →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
airdrop.blumcrypto.digital)حتى لو لم تكن جميع التفاصيل متوفرة — تقديم بلاغ على أي حال. فحتى المعلومات الجزئية تساعد في التحقيقات.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
تحليل التهديدات باستخدام قائمة الحظر المخزنة، وWHOIS، وDNS، وأدلة الفحص العامة
امسح الآنأرسل النطاقات المشبوهة إلى قاعدة بيانات التهديدات الخاصة بنا — ساهم في حماية المجتمع
إبلاغتقارير التصيد الاحتيالي الأخيرة وتغييرات التوفر الملحوظة
مراقبةراقب التهديدات في الوقت الفعلي أو اعترض على هذا الإدراج إذا كنت تعتقد أنه إنذار كاذب
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.