VirusTotal
9 / 92 engine detections
打开报告
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: vvgol.xyz — 未验证. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 9/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; PhishDestroy score…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
9 / 92 engine detections
打开报告DBL_SPAM
Scan report
打开报告no community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
vvgol.xyz is a domain on the PhishDestroy blocklist that shows visitors nothing but a page titled "Loading". It does not visibly imitate any brand, and no specific scheme has been confirmed yet. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-10-06. As of 2026-10-19 the server was still responding, but the domain's DNS was no longer resolving to content.
A blank "Loading" screen is typical of pages that wait for a script, a redirect or a visitor check before showing their real content. On crypto-fraud domains, that hidden step often leads to a wallet-connect prompt, a credential form or a redirect to another site. The evidence shows a domain that security engines treat as malicious. It does not show which of these paths vvgol.xyz uses, so any prompt to connect a wallet, sign a transaction or enter login details there should be refused.
On 2026-10-07, 9 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. Among them were Kaspersky, BitDefender, Sophos, Fortinet, G-Data, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, alphaMountain.ai and LevelBlue. That is a modest share of engines, but the vendors are well-established and work independently of each other. Spamhaus also lists the domain in its DBL as a spam domain, which points to its use in unsolicited campaigns. PhishDestroy is the only blocklist in our set that carries it so far.
The domain was registered on 2026-08-15 through Global Domain Group LLC, 52 days before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap leaves room for the domain to be set up and promoted before being noticed. It is hosted at 46.29.26.38 on AS132359 (M/S ROBI TRADERS), with the server located in Finland. A Let's Encrypt certificate gives it a padlock in the browser, which says nothing about whether the site is safe.
If you visited vvgol.xyz and connected a wallet or signed anything, open a token-approval checker and revoke any permissions you do not recognise. Move any remaining funds to a fresh wallet if you approved a transaction you did not understand. If you typed a password, change it everywhere you reuse it and turn on app-based 2FA. Never enter a seed phrase on any site. Defenders should block the domain and its IP at DNS and proxy level, and search logs for any users who reached it.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
7f607dd951498659f21c05e85d794480e0502838f57e72669afa0b142f3004c6Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of vvgol.xyz · checked Oct 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
live_content→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source9/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261006-590459
Page captured
View sourcevvgol.xyz
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
vvgol.xyz
PD-20261006-590459 Recipient: abuse@forticore.digital 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
vvgol.xyz)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.