VirusTotal
2 / 89 engine detections
打开报告“Trust Ecosystem Fund · Hold to Earn”
冒充 BNB Chain: trustencrypt.site — 内容不可用. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 2/89 (Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Kaspersky); URLScan malicious verdict; 2 external blocklist matches…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
2 / 89 engine detections
打开报告恶意
打开报告4 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告80/100
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
trustencrypt.site is an impersonation phishing page that presented itself as "Trust Ecosystem Fund · Hold to Earn," a fake rewards program aimed at crypto wallet users. The domain and title borrow the "Trust" name to look like an official ecosystem initiative. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-17. The site went offline on 2026-09-18, and as of 2026-10-19 its DNS no longer resolves.
Hold-to-earn lures promise passive rewards just for keeping tokens in a wallet. To "enroll," the visitor is asked to connect a wallet, verify holdings, or claim a bonus. In schemes of this type, that step is where the theft happens. The victim either signs a token approval or permit that lets the attacker move funds, or is pushed to type a recovery phrase into the page. Either way, the reward never arrives and the wallet's assets can be emptied.
urlscan.io rated the page malicious and recognised generic crypto branding on it. The domain is listed on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists alongside PhishDestroy, and it appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses. VirusTotal coverage was thin: only 2 of 89 engines, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and Kaspersky, flagged it on 2026-09-17. With so few engines flagging it, many security tools would have let the page load while it was live.
The domain was registered through Cloudflare, Inc. on 2026-09-16, one day before we detected it, and it was dead roughly 48 hours after registration. That short lifespan is typical of disposable phishing domains that are rotated as soon as they get blocked. The site was hosted on Amazon.com, Inc. infrastructure in the US and used a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the browser padlock said nothing about the site's legitimacy.
If you connected a wallet to this site, use a token-approval checker to review and revoke any approvals or permits you granted around 2026-09-17. If you entered a recovery phrase, treat that wallet as compromised. Create a new wallet and move any remaining funds to it immediately. Be wary of anyone who later offers to "recover" your losses, because these offers are a common follow-up scam. Defenders should block the domain and watch for lookalike "Trust" hold-to-earn domains registered nearby, since operators of this kind usually reappear under new names quickly.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
elijah.ns.cloudflare.commira.ns.cloudflare.commx.zoho.compriority 10mx2.zoho.compriority 20mx3.zoho.compriority 50Location describes the IP network.
8b923453ab7a1ff0f5044676b710879836d311946d493c5cfd8a9cc65a0d3240www.trustencrypt.siteSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.trustencrypt.siteDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
trustencrypt.site
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
可访问→不可用
0→2
可访问
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source2/89 engine detections
View sourcetrustencrypt.site
View sourcePage captured
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
trustencrypt.site)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.