ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@trustname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 5 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
网络安全情报 Registrar context
Registrar contextTrustname
Stored registration data identifies Trustname / Fewmoretaps OÜ (IANA 4318) as the registrar. PhishDestroy maintains a separate registrar investigation; that material is contextual and is not an independent detection for this domain.
This domain, sendcrypto.network, is identified as a brand impersonation threat targeting WalletConnect. The site poses an elevated risk by mimicking the legitimate WalletConnect DApp, potentially leading users to divulge sensitive information or engage in fraudulent transactions. If users trust this site, they may inadvertently provide login credentials, private keys, or other critical data, which can result in financial loss or unauthorized access to their accounts.
Analysis indicates that the domain sendcrypto.network has been flagged by 4 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, suggesting a moderate level of suspicion. The domain was created on March 22, 2026, and is registered through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com, a registrar that has been associated with suspicious activities. Infrastructure analysis reveals that the site uses Node.js, Ubuntu, Nginx, and Express, and resolves to the IP address 107.189.27.240. The Gridinsoft trust score for this domain is 0/100, indicating a high level of risk.
If a user has visited sendcrypto.network, it is crucial to take immediate action to secure their accounts. The user should change any passwords or private keys that were potentially compromised, monitor their financial and account activity for any unauthorized transactions, and report the incident to the legitimate WalletConnect service. Additionally, users are advised to install and update reputable security software to protect against similar threats and to be cautious when interacting with unfamiliar websites, especially those that request sensitive information.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Certificate fingerprint2d4692fbeb87f01a699e2c978a8331b58f071d127558708a4feac750f19a58bfCertificate names · 2 SANs
blockview.network
www.blockview.network
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Express is a web application framework for Node.js, released as free and open-source software under the MIT License. It is designed for building web applications and APIs.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of sendcrypto.network· checked Jun 26, 2026
63
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
6.07s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
6.07s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
0ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
6.07s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details1
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
timeout: raw=timeout; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='sendcrypto.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by ConnectTimeoutE
sendcrypto.network
已保存的结果
无法访问
Stored observation history1
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(BY)
PhishDestroy Investigation
