VirusTotal
8 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“packet express- confirme su pago.”
冒充 Dhl: reslug.link — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 301). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 8/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft); URLScan malicious…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
8 / 92 engine detections
打开报告恶意
打开报告Scan report
打开报告1 community reference
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
reslug.link is a phishing page that poses as DHL parcel delivery. Its Spanish-language page title, "packet express- confirme su pago.", asks visitors to confirm a payment, which points to Spanish-speaking people expecting a package. PhishDestroy first saw the domain on 2026-10-08. As of 2026-10-19 it was still online and redirecting visitors onward, so the lure remains active. The page title uses a generic "Packet Express" name rather than DHL, while urlscan.io identified DHL branding on the page itself.
Fake delivery scams usually start with a text message or email claiming a parcel is held until a small customs, shipping or redelivery fee is paid. The link leads to a page dressed as a DHL notice, here one that says "confirm your payment," where the victim enters their name, address and full card details. Many of these pages then ask for the one-time bank code, which lets the criminals approve their own charges or add the card to a mobile wallet. The fee itself is small. The real loss is the stolen card and personal data, which are used for larger fraudulent purchases.
On 2026-10-08, 8 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, MalwareURL, SOCRadar and Webroot. That is modest coverage, so many browsers and filters may still let it through. urlscan.io rated the page malicious and detected DHL branding, which supports the impersonation classification. The domain also appears in one AlienVault OTX threat pulse.
The domain was registered on 2026-05-11 through Cloudflare, Inc., about five months before PhishDestroy flagged it. That gap suggests it was either kept in reserve or used quietly before being noticed. The site is hosted on Microsoft Corporation's cloud network in the Netherlands. It has a GeoTrust certificate issued by DigiCert, so the browser padlock appears as it would on a genuine DHL site and proves nothing about legitimacy.
If you entered card details, call your bank now, block the card and dispute any charges you do not recognise. Tell the bank if you typed in an SMS or app confirmation code, since that may have authorised a payment or a card enrolment. If you gave your address and phone number, expect follow-up scam calls and texts that quote those details. Track real DHL shipments only through the official app or a site you type in yourself, never from a message link. Defenders should block the domain, search mail and SMS gateway logs for links to it, and report the page to DHL's abuse team and to the hosting provider.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
ethan.ns.cloudflare.commia.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
679d5eaf642f2aa7200d8e8c204596b709581b4b0564001be9335ee1f1b4953bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
dev.reslug.linkDomain recordproxy-dev.reslug.linkDomain recordproxy.reslug.linkDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
可访问→不可用
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
No threat flag
View sourcePD-20261008-B7A0C7
Page captured
View source1 community references
View source8/92 engine detections
View sourcereslug.link
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
reslug.link
PD-20261008-B7A0C7 Recipient: abuse@microsoft.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
reslug.link)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.