VirusTotal
14 / 90 engine detections
打开报告“Playmira: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain”
加密赌场诈骗: playmira.sbs — 内容不可用. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 14/90 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET); URLScan malicious verdict; 2 external blocklist…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
14 / 90 engine detections
打开报告恶意
打开报告4 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告80/100
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
playmira.sbs presented itself as "Playmira: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain". PhishDestroy classifies it as a fraudulent gambling site aimed at cryptocurrency holders looking for on-chain betting. We first flagged it on 2026-09-05. The site has been offline since 2026-09-11, and its DNS was still inactive at the last check on 2026-10-19.
Fake crypto casinos follow a familiar pattern. The player funds an account with crypto, and the site shows a balance that may grow through bonuses or apparent wins. When the player tries to cash out, withdrawals stall behind invented requirements such as wagering thresholds, "verification" deposits or unlock fees. The claim to be the "most popular" blockchain casino is meant to borrow credibility the brand never earned. Anything deposited should be treated as lost, and every extra fee paid only adds to the loss.
Fourteen of 90 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain when it was checked on 2026-09-06, including BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF and CyRadar. That is a solid showing for a young domain, and the flags come from independent vendors. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and tagged the page with its generic crypto and crypto-scam brand signatures. MetaMask and SEAL list the domain alongside PhishDestroy, which means wallet users were warned before connecting. Four AlienVault OTX threat pulses also reference it.
The domain was registered on 2026-05-23 through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com, about 105 days before we detected it. It went dark six days after first detection. That short active window fits a throwaway casino brand on a cheap .sbs domain, built to collect deposits and then disappear. Traffic ran through Cloudflare, Inc., with the edge address geolocated to Canada, so the true origin server stays hidden.
If you deposited funds on playmira.sbs, do not send any further payment labelled as a tax, fee or verification charge. These demands are how such sites extract more money, and paying them never releases a balance. Save transaction hashes, deposit addresses and any chat logs, then report them to the exchange you sent from and to your local cybercrime unit. If you reused a password on the site, change it wherever else you use it and turn on two-factor authentication. Defenders should block the domain, add it to DNS and proxy filters, and watch for copies of the Playmira branding on new domains.
Last checked
The linked repository preserves daily zone observations across seven ShortDot-operated TLDs, including registration volume and abuse-related indicators. This registry context is supporting background and is not an independent detection for the domain in this report.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
anuj.ns.cloudflare.comtani.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
6479922676a202e1efcf9eadea57d6c795f26614b9d3bf40f3706b65a21a404fSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of playmira.sbs · checked Sep 5, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
可访问→不可用
可访问
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source14/90 engine detections
View sourceplaymira.sbs
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
playmira.sbs
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
playmira.sbs)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.