VirusTotal
2 / 94 engine detections
打开报告“SolCard - The Card For All Your Web3 Needs”
加密钱包盗取程序: phantomcard.digital — 内容不可用. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 2/94 (Gridinsoft, Seclookup); URLQuery 1 alert; cloaking observed; PhishDestroy score 98/100. 注册商: PDR.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
2 / 94 engine detections
打开报告1 threat-system alert
打开报告Suspicious
打开报告4/12
checked — no match recorded
no community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Page capture
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hagezi Threat Feed | phantomcard.digital |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
PhishDestroy identifies the domain phantomcard.digital as an active crypto drainer phishing campaign leveraging a Solana Drainer kit. The threat actor impersonates a legitimate financial service ('phantomcard') to deceive victims into connecting cryptocurrency wallets and authorizing unauthorized transfers. This domain is part of a broader trend where attackers clone legitimate web3 brands to exploit user trust and drain digital assets. The drainer kit is specifically designed to target Solana-based wallets, enabling rapid theft of tokens and NFTs once wallet permissions are granted.
Technical indicators confirm the domain's malicious intent. VirusTotal currently shows 0 detections out of 95 engines, indicating undetected threat activity. The domain was registered through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com and resolves to IP 104.21.44.49. Registered on March 24, 2026, it has already been flagged by Google Safe Browsing (GSB) and appears on 2 security blocklists. The use of a Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate adds a veneer of legitimacy, while the Solana Drainer kit demonstrates a sophisticated attack methodology.
The campaign remains active despite initial countermeasures. The domain is currently blocked by SEAL and MetaMask, limiting immediate exposure for some users. However, the lack of detection on VirusTotal and recent registration date suggest this threat is still emerging and may evade automated defenses. The risk level is classified as high due to the active drainer kit, evasion of detection, and targeting of high-value cryptocurrency assets. Users are advised to avoid interacting with phantomcard.digital, verify domain authenticity via official channels, and report suspicious activity to security teams. Remaining risk includes potential expansion of the campaign to additional domains or persistence through DNS changes.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
https://t.me/solcard_tgStored page referenceIoC extraction recorded 2026-08-01 04:19:28 UTC
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
garrett.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of phantomcard.digital · checked Mar 29, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
content_divergence · unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='phantomcard.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE
phantomcard.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
2/94 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcephantomcard.digital
View sourcePD-20260329-F1375A
已存储 3 个仿冒域名
由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2026年3月29日
PD-20260329-F1375A Recipient: abuse@publicdomainregistry.com Registrar: PublicDomainRegistry (PDR Ltd.) (India) Policy Violations: Explicit policy to immediately suspend domains used for phishing, 419 scams, identity fraud, malware distribution without prior notice Applicable Laws: IT Act 2000 §§66C–66D (identity theft, cheating by personation), Indian Penal Code §420 / Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita §318 (fraud)
如果您与此域交互、输入个人信息或连接加密货币钱包,请立即采取行动。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
据估计 $51 billion 于2024年流入非法加密货币钱包(source). 如果你曾与 phantomcard.digital — 立即行动。
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
据 联邦调查局,其中最重要的细节是交易数据:
0x5856...35985)phantomcard.digital)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.