ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@dynadot.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
phantom-app.services is a crypto drainer site built to impersonate Phantom, the widely used Solana wallet application, with the goal of stealing cryptocurrency from Solana users who believe they are interacting with a legitimate service. PhishDestroy first identified it on 2026-09-02, just one day after the domain was registered, indicating it was flagged almost immediately upon deployment. As of 2026-10-18 the site remains alive and reachable, meaning it is still an active threat to anyone who encounters it.
How the scam works
The site deploys a Solana Drainer kit, a category of malicious tooling that prompts visitors to connect their Solana wallet under the pretense of accessing a legitimate Phantom feature or service. Once a wallet is connected, the kit requests transaction approvals or signing permissions that silently authorize the transfer of tokens and NFTs out of the victim's wallet to attacker-controlled addresses. The victim can lose their entire Solana holdings, including SPL tokens and NFTs, in a matter of seconds. The page currently returns a 403 Forbidden title, which conflicts with the active drainer classification; the site is nonetheless confirmed reachable and malicious by multiple independent sources.
Evidence
Fifteen of 89 engines on VirusTotal flagged this domain as malicious as of 2026-09-12, with detections from BitDefender, ESET, Emsisoft, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft, CRDF, and alphaMountain.ai among others. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and associated the domain with generic crypto brand abuse. Spamhaus lists it under DBL_PHISH, its dedicated phishing category. The domain also appears on the PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL blocklists, and has accumulated four threat pulses on OTX.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-09-01 through Dynadot Inc and was weaponized within 24 hours. It is hosted on Cloudflare's network, with the hosting node geolocated to Canada. The TLS certificate was issued by Google Trust Services under the WE1 intermediate, giving the site a padlock that lends it a superficial appearance of legitimacy.
What to do
If you visited this site and connected a Solana wallet, immediately revoke all token approvals and spending permissions granted to unknown programs using a Solana approval-management tool. Move remaining funds to a fresh wallet address that has never interacted with this site. If you signed any transactions, assume those assets are lost and report the incident to your wallet provider. Security teams and defenders should ensure phantom-app.services is blocked at the DNS and proxy layer and add it to internal threat-intelligence feeds.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年10月9日score 100/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://phantom-app.services/
Favicon Hash
案件 ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
认证和 RAA 背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeReachable but protectedreason: HTTP access restricted65% confidence
AttributionCloudflaremechanism: Access Restrictionsource: Current Http Probe
Evidence layersAvailability: Reachable but protectedContent: UnknownDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationReachable but protectedHTTP access restrictedCloudflareAccess Restriction65%2026-10-19 22:18:29 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:18:29 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
您的加密货币交易所 — notify its fraud team immediately; it may be able to preserve records or restrict funds held on its platform
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
加密货币诈骗通常是如何运作的？
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
恶意批准 — “连接钱包”的提示会使攻击者获得无限的代币消费权限
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
