VirusTotal
13 / 93
报告Interpretation & limits
Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
“Index of /”
Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →
metahoper.digital — 内容不可用. 诈骗类型:Impersonation. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 13/93 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, ESET); 1 external blocklist match (CryptoFirewall); PhishDestroy score 89/100. 注册商: Web Commerce Communica….
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.
13 / 93
报告Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
5 community references
报告Community publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.
存储的报告
报告 A preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.
分析完成
报告This is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.
Checked; no threat flag recorded
报告A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates.
Analysis indicates that the domain metahoper.digital was registered on 21 February 2026 through Web Commerce Communications Limited dba WebNic.cc. The authoritative name servers ns100.webnic.cc and ns101.webnic.cc resolve the name to the IPv4 address 185.208.156.66, which belongs to AS42624 (Global-Data System IT Corporation) and is geolocated in Switzerland. The site is presently taken offline, and its SSL certificate is identified only as “R10”, offering no meaningful validation of the host’s identity. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 out of 100, reflecting a complete lack of confidence in the domain.
VirusTotal records show that 13 of 93 scanning engines flag the host as malicious, reinforcing the suspicion of abuse. The domain appears on two external blocklists and has been incorporated into five AlienVault OTX threat pulses, indicating that it has been observed in multiple intelligence sources. Defensive products PhishDestroy and CryptoFirewall have already listed the domain as blocked. The page title returned by HTTP requests is “Index of /”, which does not disclose any brand or service being spoofed, and no additional content analysis is available.
Consequently, the specific victim‑targeted brand, if any, cannot be confirmed at this time. The combination of low trust score, multiple vendor detections, blocklist presence, and OTX citations suggests a high likelihood that the domain was used for a generic phishing campaign, possibly to harvest credentials or deliver malicious payloads. Defenders should ensure that any outbound connections to 185.208.156.66 are denied, add metahoper.digital to DNS sinkhole or blocklist policies, and monitor for any login attempts or data exfiltration attempts that reference the domain. Continuous re‑evaluation is recommended in case the site is re‑activated, and any associated payloads should be submitted to sandbox environments for deeper analysis.
针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录,以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。
扫描说明: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='metahoper.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErr
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns101.webnic.ccLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
10 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2025年8月10日
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent