VirusTotal
3 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“MEN”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@name.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 24 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
冒充 ["gmail"]: men2020.company — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 3/92 (Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 81/100. 注册商…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
3 / 92 engine detections
打开报告Scan report
打开报告4 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
men2020.company is an impersonation phishing page that copies a legitimate service to win visitors' trust. It carries the bare page title "MEN" and shows no recognisable brand name. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-26. When last checked on 2026-10-19, the site was still online and serving its content, so it remains a live risk.
Impersonation pages borrow the look, wording and branding of a service people already use. That familiarity lowers suspicion at the moment a visitor is asked to sign in, verify an account or make a payment. Anything typed into the page goes straight to the operators: usernames, passwords, one-time codes, card details, or in crypto-themed variants, seed phrases and wallet access. The vague "MEN" title and the generic domain name give a casual visitor little reason to stop and question what they are looking at.
Independent detection is still thin. VirusTotal showed 3 of 92 engines flagging the domain on 2026-10-10: Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That low count is typical of a fresh phishing domain that most vendors have not yet reviewed. It should not be read as a sign that the site is safe. Beyond PhishDestroy, the domain appears on the PhishFeed blocklist, and four AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference it, so several separate intelligence sources have tied it to malicious activity.
The domain was registered through Name.com, Inc. on 2026-06-21, about three months before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap suggests it was either held in reserve or quietly used before it drew attention. It resolves to 64.29.17.1 on Amazon.com, Inc. infrastructure in the US. Its certificate is a free, automatically issued Let's Encrypt (YR2) certificate, so the browser padlock only means the connection is encrypted and says nothing about who runs the site.
If you entered a password on this site, change it right away, along with any other account that reuses it. Then turn on app-based two-factor authentication. If you submitted card or banking details, contact your bank to block the card and dispute any charges. If you shared a seed phrase, move your funds to a newly created wallet immediately. Defenders should block men2020.company at the DNS and proxy level and search logs for past visits. Any user who reached the site should be treated as a possible credential compromise.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
ns1.vercel-dns.comns2.vercel-dns.comLocation describes the IP network.
f5d52ecabd3e09535ff62c9db9083bd4eaae8a9bdb3820bc101586ae63f81f11Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of men2020.company · checked Sep 26, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
protected→live_content
content_served
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
0→1
可访问
3/92 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20260926-0CBB5D
men2020.company
View sourcePage captured
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
men2020.company
PD-20260926-0CBB5D Recipient: abuse@name.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
men2020.company)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.