跳转到安全报告
分析仪表盘
域安全和威胁情报
lombard-lux.finance favicon

lombard-lux.finance

“Kaito”

威胁判定
关键域名申诉
Assessment sources

Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →

可用性 内容不可用 最新观察中的内容不可用 观察到 · HTTP probe
风险信号
病毒检测总数：13/91 存储的阻止列表匹配项：1 品牌冒充：MetaMask
2025年9月11日 MetaMask CDN
API
注册商
Web Commerce Communica…
Resolved IP
104.21.32.1
已保存的截图 1 / 2 View full size
Primary capture Wayback
该域名已被标记为恶意域名
安全引擎报告检测：13。 报告匹配的公共黑名单：1。 请格外小心——不要输入凭据或个人信息。
报告概览

lombard-lux.finance — 内容不可用. 品牌冒充：MetaMask; 诈骗类型：Crypto Drainer; Drainer: Angel Drainer. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 13/91 (ADMINUSLabs, ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao); 1 external blocklist match (ScamSniffer); PhishDestroy score 100/100. 注册商: Web Commerce Communica….

为保留原始取证记录，下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。

Additional indicators at a glance
VirusTotal
VirusTotal
13 det.
URLScan
URLScan
报告 ↗
观测状态
内容不可用
PhishDestroy
DestroyList
已列入

Source evidence

6 sources

These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.

VirusTotal

13 / 91

报告
Interpretation & limits

Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.

OTX

no community references

报告
Interpretation & limits

Community publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.

CF雷达

provider verdict: clean

Observation time not recorded
报告
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

URLScan capture

存储的报告

Stored URLScan capture preview
报告
Interpretation & limits

A preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.

URLScan verdict

分析完成

报告
Interpretation & limits

This is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.

Google Safe Browsing

Checked; no threat flag recorded

报告
Interpretation & limits

A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.

证据摘要

关键
VirusTotal
13/91
URLScan
Stored capture

Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates.

Analysis of lombard-lux.finance as of July 24, 2026 indicates that the domain is currently offline but was previously used as a crypto‑drainer targeting MetaMask users. The site resolved to the Cloudflare edge address 104.21.32.1, hosted in the United States under ASN 13335 (Cloudflare, Inc.). Its authoritative nameservers, ignacio.ns.cloudflare.com and miki.ns.cloudflare.com, confirm that the infrastructure relied on Cloudflare’s DNS service. Registration was handled by Web Commerce Communications Limited, a registrar commonly associated with bulk‑registered domains.

No TLS certificate was served, meaning the site operated without HTTPS encryption. The page title observed during the brief capture was “Kaito,” and the campaign employed the Angel Drainer kit, a known tool for siphoning cryptocurrency assets. VirusTotal records show that ten of ninety‑five scanning engines flagged the domain as malicious, and the domain appears on two public blocklists, specifically PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of zero out of one hundred, reinforcing the malicious assessment.

The domain explicitly impersonated the MetaMask brand, aligning with the reported fake‑airdrop scam type. While the domain is now taken offline, defenders should continue to monitor the associated IP address and Cloudflare nameservers for reuse, add the domain and its IP to internal blocklists, and enforce strict URL filtering for any requests to lombard‑lux.finance. Network traffic to the resolved IP should be inspected for signs of the Angel Drainer payload, and endpoint protection should be updated to recognize the identified indicators of compromise. Because the site lacked HTTPS, any credential capture would have occurred over cleartext, further emphasizing the need for robust user education on verifying TLS connections when interacting with MetaMask‑related services.

探测与规避分析

隐身和流量分配检查

未观察到 在存储的扫描图像中未观察到遮蔽现象

针对该主机的爬虫与浏览器观察记录，以及针对“Keitaro”式流量分配系统的实时指纹检测。

存储的隐身标志
未观察到
伪装评分
0/6
上次隐形扫描

扫描说明: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='lombard-lux.finance', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE

TDS指纹识别实时演示
七个Keitaro指纹，外加爬虫与浏览器的对比，当此面板打开时，由PhishDestroy扫描器运行。
等待

已保存的截图 · 2 captures

Primary capture 1 / 2
来源Primary capture
Recorded2026-03-05 21:35 UTC
StateStored capture
Position1 / 2
Open capture Wayback 下载
页面标题
Kaito
Impersonates
MetaMask

Domain details

域名
URLScan Verdict 分析完成 score 0 report ↗
IP Context Cloudflare shared edge origin IP hidden Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
注册商 Web Commerce Communica… MY(MY)
滥用举报联系方式postmaster@lombard-lux.finance, webmaster@lombard-lux.finance, admin@lombard-lux.finance, abuse@lombard-lux.finance, info@lombard-lux.finance, contact@lombard-lux.finance
ICANN 注册管理机构ICANN Lookup (RDAP) →
WHOIS查询lombard-lux.finance 的 ICANN RDAP →
首次不可用所需时间 239 days
统计口径 从第一个存储的滥用报告到第一次观察到内容不可用所经过的时间。这并不能确定原因。
每份报告包含哪些内容 存储的传出报告记录可以参考当时可用的证据，例如供应商判决、注册数据、托管详细信息、分类或屏幕截图。此页面无法推断收件人交付、接收、确认或操作的确切有效负载。
技术详情Provenance & timestamps
首次发现2025年9月11日
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月24日score 25/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://lombard-lux.finance/
ICANN OVERSIGHT

认证和 RAA 背景

Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations

For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.

Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.

RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.

认证是一纸合同，不是安全印章。 核实 ICANN 费用 阅读 RAA §3.18 PHISHDESTROY INVESTIGATIONICANN funding, contracts, and DNS abuse oversight
Accountability draft 不会自动发送任何内容。

Network & certificates

Stored technical evidence

Network & DNS

Shared CDN edge
Resolved IP
104.21.32.1
Network ASN
AS13335
Organization
Cloudflare, Inc.
Observed location
San Francisco, US
Server header
cloudflare

Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。

域名服务器 2

  • ignacio.ns.cloudflare.com
  • miki.ns.cloudflare.com

Location describes the IP network.

viewdns.info · 104.21.32.1rapiddns.io

Latest Classified Outcome 2026-10-14 20:21:26 UTC

Primary outcome DNS 非活动 reason: DNS NXDOMAIN 80% confidence
Attribution source: Dns Cache
Evidence layers Availability: DNS inactive Content: Unreachable DNS: NXDOMAIN Registration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation 未知 Probe Inconclusive 20% 2026-10-13 01:15:11 UTC
RDAP registration 未知
Observed timeline last reachable: 2026-08-11 22:13:41 UTC current episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC observed RIP window: 2026-08-11 22:13:41 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 1,194.02h midpoint estimate ≈ 2026-09-05 19:14:18 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
举报此域名 提交证据，帮助保护他人

VirusTotal 分析

13 / 91 安全供应商标记了该域
View on VT
Last analyzed Previous stored snapshot: 13 detections
ADMINUSLabs
ChainPatrol
alphaMountain.ai
BitDefender
Chong Lua Dao
CRDF
CyRadar
Forcepoint ThreatSeeker
Fortinet
G-Data
Gridinsoft
Lionic
Sophos

Forensic History & Detection Timeline

ThreatLifecycleTelemetry
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
  1. Cloudflare Radar Scan 2026-03-07 17:17:43 UTC
    Source: Cloudflare Radar
    Event details
    Cloudflare Radar scan registered: View Radar report.

威胁响应 Pipeline

发现
Analysis
Monitoring

12 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.

已捕获威胁
lombard-lux.finance 已检测到并排入队，待进行全面分析
2025年9月11日
URLScan.io Capture
已存储 URLScan report with capture artifacts
2026年3月5日
Cloudflare Radar Report
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
VirusTotal
13/91 recorded on VirusTotal
2026年8月19日
黑名单检测
见于 1 blocklist: ScamSniffer
2026年10月15日
Drainer Identified
Angel Drainer wallet drainer — impersonating MetaMask
Forensic Evidence Collected
Stored evidence from URLScan.io, stored screenshot
2026年3月5日
Technical Analysis Recorded
该报告包含存储的技术或取证分析结果。
2026年10月15日
Cloudflare Radar Scan
使用 Cloudflare 雷达扫描；网络分析完成。
2026年3月7日
DestroyList 已发布
Listed in the public PhishDestroy/DestroyList repository
2025年9月11日
Content Observed Unavailable
最新存储的检查表明报告的内容不可用；这并不能确定是谁或什么原因造成了这种变化。
2026年5月8日
首次不可用所需时间
5726 从检测到第一次不可用的观察经过了几个小时。
How we investigate & report

Public scans, evidence and abuse channels

We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.

01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups
urlscan.io Screenshot · DOM · HTTP

Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.

VirusTotal Multi-engine verdicts

Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.

Cloudflare Radar DNS · certificates · categories

Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.

AlienVault OTX Threat-intelligence pulses

Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.

crt.sh Certificate Transparency

Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.

DNS Security Filters Quad9 · AdGuard · CleanBrowsing

Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.

Web-Check Surface inspection

Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.

02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels
  1. Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
  2. Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
  3. Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
  4. Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.

Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.

GoogleSafe Browsing GoogleWeb Risk MicrosoftSmartScreen VirusTotalURL analysis CloudflareRadar / abuse reporting YandexSafe Browsing URLScan.ioPublic scan ESETSample / URL submission BitdefenderURL submission NortonSafe Web Symantec网站评审 AviraURL reporting Avast / AVGURL reporting 卡巴斯基OpenTIP Dr.WebOnline scanner NetcraftAbuse reporting PhishTankCommunity reporting APWG eCXPhishing intelligence PhishStatsPublic feed Phish.ReportHosting abuse SpamhausDomain reputation PolySwarmMulti-engine analysis CheckPhishURL scan QutteraMalware scan URLqueryBrowser analysis Criminal IPAsset intelligence CRDFThreat Center ScamadviserReputation check MyWOTCommunity reputation

公共封禁名单状态

仿冒域名

已存储 79 个仿冒域名

etamask.io omission 内部报告 meetamask.io repetition 内部报告 megamask.io replacement 内部报告 metam.ask.io subdomain 内部报告 metamaak.io replacement 内部报告 metamadk.io replacement 内部报告 metamaks.io transposition 内部报告 metamassk.io insertion 内部报告 metamsask.io insertion 内部报告 metamssk.io replacement 内部报告 metanask.io homoglyph 内部报告 metanmask.io homoglyph 内部报告
显示全部（67）
metasmask.io insertion 内部报告 metramask.io insertion 内部报告 mewtamask.io insertion 内部报告 mmetamask.io homoglyph 内部报告 mtamask.io omission 内部报告 mwetamask.io insertion 内部报告 nmetamask.io homoglyph 内部报告 metamark.io bitsquatting 内部报告 metamaskj.io addition 内部报告 metammask.io homoglyph 内部报告 metamnask.io homoglyph 内部报告 emtamask.io transposition m-etamask.io hyphenation meamask.io omission meatmask.io transposition meramask.io replacement mertamask.io insertion metaamask.io repetition metaamsk.io transposition metaask.io omission metalmask.io insertion metamaask.io insertion metamadsk.io insertion metamaek.io replacement metamak.io omission metamas.io omission metamasak.io insertion metamasdk.io insertion metamask-io.com various metamasl.io replacement metamasm.io replacement metamsak.io transposition metamsk.io omission metamusk.io vowel-swap metamzsk.io replacement metarnask.io homoglyph metmaask.io transposition metmask.io omission metsamask.io insertion metsmask.io replacement mettamask.io repetition metwmask.io replacement metyamask.io insertion metzmask.io replacement meyamask.io replacement meytamask.io insertion mitamask.io vowel-swap mnetamask.io homoglyph mretamask.io insertion mrtamask.io replacement mstamask.io replacement mteamask.io transposition mwtamask.io replacement rnetamask.io homoglyph matamask.io bitsquatting mdtamask.io bitsquatting metamasi.io bitsquatting metamasj.io bitsquatting metamaska.io addition metamaskk.io addition metamaskl.io addition metamaso.io bitsquatting metamesk.io bitsquatting metamqsk.io bitsquatting metemask.io bitsquatting netamask.io homoglyph xn--metamas-bhb.io homoglyph

社区报告

由 1 名社区成员报告；首次发现于 2025年9月11日

已存储报告
1
已报告的唯一 URL
1
已接受1

证据与外部报告

证券分析
URLScan Analyzed VirusTotal 13 det. ChainPatrol URLQuery Report stored SSL 实验室 CF雷达 打开报告 WOT ScamAdviser 黑名单检查器 URLVoid Sucuri SiteCheck MDN 观测站
OSINT与情报分析
Web-Check Full scan SOCRadar Dark web report LeakIX Leak search Shodan Censys ThreatFox 哈德逊岩 Sign-in search IntelX crt.sh 证书 WHOIS Wayback
DNS 与网络
nslookup.io DNS bgp.tools ASN /路线
SEO 与域名
SpyFu Moz DA/PA Ahrefs 反向链接
深度分析
深度分析
报告
ChainAbuse

您是否受到本网站的影响？

4 evidence signal groups linked 0 reports recorded 内容不可用
If credentials were compromised, report immediately. Do not engage with recovery scammers.

如果您与此域交互、输入个人信息或连接加密货币钱包，请立即采取行动。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。

欧洲刑警组织
查找您所在欧盟国家/地区的官方报告渠道
National police directory
Chainabuse
Report a crypto wallet, transaction, or phishing URL
SEAL -ISAC
Security Alliance crypto threat intelligence
PhishDestroy listing review 不是执法报告
域名申诉
如果您拥有该域名并认为该列表不正确，请请求审核
警惕“数据恢复”诈骗！ 犯罪分子可能会冒充调查员、律师或追债员再次联系受害者。 请勿支付预付费用或共享凭证。 没有任何合法服务可以保证恢复被盗的加密货币。 了解有关康复欺诈的更多信息 →

向当地主管部门报告

选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。

97个国家目录

Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent

AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交

检查任意域名

使用存储的阻止列表、WHOIS、DNS 和公共扫描证据进行威胁分析

立即扫描

举报网络钓鱼

将可疑域名提交至我们的威胁数据库——保护社区

报告

实时威胁动态

最近的网络钓鱼报告和观察到的可用性变化

监控

随时掌握最新信息，确保安全

请实时监控威胁，或者如果您认为这是误报，请对该条目提出异议

实时威胁动态 对该列表提出异议

针对受害者的建议与指导

据估计 $51 billion 于2024年流入非法加密货币钱包（source). 如果你曾与 lombard-lux.finance — 立即行动。

我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
  • 撤销令牌授权 — use revoke.cash 撤销授予恶意智能合约的访问权限
  • 转移剩余资金 迁移到一个全新的钱包。该受损钱包已不再安全
  • 更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
  • 启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
  • 冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南

据 联邦调查局，其中最重要的细节是交易数据：

  • 加密货币地址 — 诈骗分子的钱包（例如， 0x5856...35985)
  • 金额及加密货币类型 — 确切金额（例如：1.02345 ETH、0.5 BTC、500 USDT）
  • 交易 ID（哈希值） — 唯一的区块链交易标识符
  • 确切日期和时间 — 每笔交易的详情以及与诈骗者的首次接触
  • 屏幕截图 — 诈骗网站、聊天消息、电子邮件、钱包交易、社交媒体
  • 所有网址和域名 诈骗者使用的（包括 lombard-lux.finance)
  • 通信 — 诈骗者使用的电子邮件、短信、电话号码、用户名

即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整，对调查仍有帮助。

我应该向哪里举报这起诈骗？
  • 联邦调查局（FBI）IC3 — 互联网犯罪投诉中心（美国联邦举报渠道）
  • 欧洲刑警组织 — 欧洲网络犯罪报告（欧盟）
  • Chainabuse — 在各交易所和平台上标记诈骗钱包
  • 您的加密货币交易所 — notify its fraud team immediately; it may be able to preserve records or restrict funds held on its platform
  • 当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录

A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.

加密货币诈骗通常是如何运作的？
  • 虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
  • 恶意批准 — “连接钱包”的提示会使攻击者获得无限的代币消费权限
  • 猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
  • 退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
  • 虚假广告与空投 — 谷歌/社交媒体广告和“免费代币”优惠会导致钱包被掏空
  • 利用人工智能实施的诈骗 — 深度伪造、自动化网络钓鱼以及人工智能生成的网站，使得欺诈行为更难被察觉
将来我该如何保护自己？
  • 使用硬件钱包 （Ledger、Trezor）。切勿在浏览器钱包中存储大额资金
  • 将官方网站添加到书签 — 切勿点击来自电子邮件、私信或广告中的链接
  • 阅读每项批准 — 签名前请验证权限。拒绝无限制的批准
  • 验证域名 — 查看 PhishDestroy 在进行互动之前，请检查HTTPS、拼写和域名注册时间。
  • “好得令人难以置信”=骗局 — 保证收益、名人代言、紧迫的截止日期
HTML · IFRAME

嵌入此报告

在您的网站或博客上分享此威胁情报

embed.html 
<iframe
  src="https://phishdestroy.io/zh/embed/domain/lombard-lux.finance"
  title="PhishDestroy threat report for lombard-lux.finance"
  width="100%" height="320"
  loading="lazy"
  referrerpolicy="no-referrer"
  sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px;max-width:100%"
></iframe>