VirusTotal
5 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“Vote”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@registrar.eu.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 10 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
冒充 Coinmarketcap: listup.blog — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 5/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar)…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
5 / 92 engine detections
打开报告Suspicious
打开报告DBL_SPAM
Scan report
打开报告3 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
listup.blog is an impersonation phishing page that presents itself under the bare title "Vote", posing as a poll or contest page. It targets people who arrive through shared links asking them to support someone. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-09, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still online with its phishing content live.
Fake voting pages usually spread through messages from friends or compromised accounts asking you to "vote for me" in a competition. To cast the vote, the page asks you to sign in or confirm your identity through what looks like a familiar service. Whatever you type there, whether username, password or one-time code, goes straight to the operators, who use it to take over the account and send the same lure to your contacts. Its listing on ScamSniffer, a crypto-focused blocklist, suggests the operators are also after accounts that hold or control crypto assets.
On 2026-10-17, five of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That is a low count, typical of a domain this new, so many browsers and filters will not warn you yet. Spamhaus lists it in its domain blocklist as spam, ScamSniffer blocks it alongside PhishDestroy, and three AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference it.
The domain was registered on 2026-10-01 through Hosting Concepts B.V. (Registrar.eu) and was already serving phishing content when PhishDestroy caught it eight days later. That short gap is typical of throwaway domains bought specifically for a campaign. It is hosted in Germany on the DEDIK SERVICES LIMITED network.
If you entered a login on this page, change that password immediately, along with any other account that uses the same one. Sign out of all active sessions and turn on two-factor authentication through an authenticator app. If you typed in a verification code, assume the account may already be compromised: check its recovery email, phone number and linked devices, and warn your contacts not to open voting links sent from your account. Defenders should block listup.blog at DNS and proxy level, and search mail and chat logs for messages that contain it.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
amy.ns.cloudflare.combrady.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
d726b25df4cbfc94f951f9b58ffd4f15a6ca52efc4bbd799f4ac9e4fe6926b80Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of listup.blog · checked Oct 9, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source5/92 engine detections
View source3 community references
View sourcePD-20261009-85B978
Page captured
View sourcelistup.blog
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
listup.blog
PD-20261009-85B978 Recipient: abuse@registrar.eu 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
listup.blog)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.