VirusTotal
8 / 95 engine detections
打开报告“Jupiter | Airdrop”
虚假空投: jup.giving — 内容不可用. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 8/95 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); PhishDestroy score 74/100. 注册商…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
8 / 95 engine detections
打开报告no community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain jup.giving has been identified as a brand impersonation threat specifically targeting Jupiter, a cryptocurrency platform. Analysis indicates this site operated as a crypto drainer, designed to deceive users into connecting wallets and authorizing transactions that result in unauthorized fund transfers. The domain is currently offline, but prior activity confirms its malicious intent. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered through Web Commerce Communications Limited on November 16, 2025, and resolved to the IP address 57.129.97.29. Detection metrics show the domain was flagged by 8 of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, with one active entry on security blocklists. The site lacked an SSL certificate, further diminishing its legitimacy. The page title, 'Jupiter | Airdrop,' was crafted to mimic official Jupiter airdrop campaigns, a common tactic in crypto drainer operations. As of the latest assessment, jup.giving has been taken offline, likely due to enforcement actions or abandonment by the threat actor. Users who interacted with this domain are advised to immediately revoke any wallet permissions granted during the interaction. Cryptocurrency holders should verify all airdrop-related communications through official Jupiter channels and employ hardware wallets or isolated browser sessions for sensitive transactions. Monitoring for unauthorized transactions and rotating credentials associated with crypto services is strongly recommended.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
chase.ns.cloudflare.comjoselyn.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='jup.giving', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("SOC
jup.giving
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/eff371a9-3385-44d5-80cb-71cccdda74df
No threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View source8/95 engine detections
View sourcejup.giving
View source由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2025年11月20日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
jup.giving)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.