jito-rewards.network was observed on July 24, 2026 with the HTTP response indicating a Plesk Obsidian 18.0.71 control panel page. The site was taken offline at the time of analysis, but the underlying infrastructure remains visible. The domain resolves to the Cloudflare edge address 104.21.38.10, which belongs to ASN 13335 (Cloudflare, Inc.) and is geolocated in the United States. Nameservers harlan.ns.cloudflare.com and nena.ns.cloudflare.com confirm that the domain is fully proxied through Cloudflare, a common choice for fast‑flux and abuse campaigns. No TLS certificate was presented, meaning HTTPS was not enforced, which further reduces the credibility of the service. The page title and the declared scam type “Fake Airdrop” indicate that the operator attempted to impersonate the legitimate Jito brand, likely to lure cryptocurrency users into submitting private keys or wallet credentials.
Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0 out of 100, reflecting a complete lack of trust. The domain appears on two independent security blocklists and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy and ScamSniffer. VirusTotal scans show that five of ninety‑five antivirus and URL‑reputation engines flagged the domain as malicious, providing additional corroboration of its abusive nature. Registration data shows the domain was created through Cloudflare, Inc., a registrar that often masks registrant details, making attribution difficult. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and the use of a generic Plesk control panel page are consistent with a low‑effort fraudulent operation rather than a sophisticated phishing infrastructure.
However, the use of Cloudflare’s network gives the operator the ability to rapidly relocate the service if needed, so the threat may reappear under a different sub‑domain or IP. Defenders should add 104.21.38.10 to network‑level blocklists, enforce domain‑level deny rules for jito-rewards.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月23日score 68/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://jito-rewards.network/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
认证和 RAA 背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非活动reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-21 01:08:33 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-17 22:13:25 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-17 22:13:25 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,514.03hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-09 07:14:10 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='jito-rewards.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnection
jito-rewards.network
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
