VirusTotal
6 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“Hightrades”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@whiteprivacy.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 11 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: hightradesfx.cc — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 6/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Netcraft, SOCRadar); Spamhaus…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
6 / 92 engine detections
打开报告Suspicious
打开报告DBL_SPAM
Scan report
打开报告4 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
hightradesfx.cc presents itself under the name "Hightrades". The "fx" in the domain points at forex-style trading. PhishDestroy classifies it as an impersonation phishing page aimed at people looking to trade or invest under that brand. We first flagged it on 2026-10-08, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its content.
Impersonation sites like this copy the name and look of a trading platform so visitors believe they are signing up with a legitimate service. Victims are typically asked to register, hand over login details or personal information, and fund an "account" whose balance exists only on the scammer's dashboard. Credentials entered on the "Hightrades" page go straight to the operators. Any money deposited is gone, and requests to withdraw often trigger demands for extra "fees" or "taxes" that are simply more theft.
Six of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-16: alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Netcraft, SOCRadar and desenmascara.me. That count is modest, but these are separate vendors, including phishing-focused ones such as Netcraft, reaching the same verdict on their own. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as a spam domain, and it appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses. Among blocklists, it is currently carried by PhishDestroy.
The domain was registered on 2026-05-24 through Global Domain Group LLC, about four and a half months before we detected it. That gap suggests it was set up well ahead of use rather than spun up on the day. It resolves to 163.61.188.2 on the NEWDHAKAHARDWARE-AS-AP network, an autonomous system registered to New Dhaka Hardware in Bangladesh, while the address itself geolocates to the United States. Its Let's Encrypt certificate only means the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the operator is trustworthy.
Do not register, log in or send funds on this site. If you entered a password there, change it anywhere you reused it and turn on two-factor authentication. If you deposited money, stop all further payments, ignore any "withdrawal fee" demand, and contact your bank or card issuer to dispute the transfer. Keep screenshots and payment receipts for a police report. Defenders should block the domain and its IP at the DNS and proxy level and watch for lookalike domains reusing the Hightrades name.
dns1.lytehosting.comdns2.lytehosting.comdns3.lytehosting.comdns4.lytehosting.comhightradesfx.ccpriority 0Location describes the IP network.
89bde5eec715272736c11f37a6048bb1bd4cf9d3a6af3e2f99c623f474b5ecfaSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of hightradesfx.cc · checked Oct 8, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
可访问
No threat flag
View source6/92 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePD-20261008-2D7628
hightradesfx.cc
View sourcePage captured
View source已存储 131 个仿冒域名
显示 131 个中的 100 个
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
hightradesfx.cc
PD-20261008-2D7628 Recipient: abuse@whiteprivacy.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
hightradesfx.cc)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.