VirusTotal
7 / 92 engine detections
打开报告
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@forticore.digital.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 13 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: fort-skins.xyz — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 7/92 (alphaMountain.ai, Bfore.Ai PreCrime, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); URLQuery 2…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
7 / 92 engine detections
打开报告2 det.
打开报告DBL_SPAM
2 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
fort-skins.xyz is a domain on the PhishDestroy blocklist that PhishDestroy first saw on 2026-10-06. It has not yet been assigned to a specific scheme. Its name refers to "skins", a term commonly used for cosmetic in-game items, but no impersonated brand has been confirmed. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving live content.
The page presents itself only with the title "Loading". That generic placeholder does not reveal what the site offers or what it later asks visitors to do. Because a scheme has not been confirmed, the risk follows from the flags: several security vendors list the domain as malicious or phishing, and Spamhaus lists it for spam. Domains with this profile typically try to collect logins, personal details or payments. Treat any form, login prompt, download or wallet request on this site as hostile.
On 2026-10-10, 7 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, Bfore.Ai PreCrime, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That is a minority of engines, but the vendors include both predictive and reputation-based services, so the flags come from different detection methods. Spamhaus lists the domain on its DBL with a spam classification. The domain also appears in 2 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which means other researchers have tracked it as well.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-06 through Global Domain Group LLC, exactly one month before PhishDestroy picked it up. That means it was new when it came under suspicion. It resolves to 46.29.26.38, an address in Finland announced by MSROBITRADERS-AS-AP (M/S ROBI TRADERS), a network registered in Bangladesh. The site uses a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site is trustworthy.
Do not enter credentials, personal details or payment information on fort-skins.xyz. If you signed in there with a gaming, email or other account, change that password immediately, enable two-factor authentication and review recent account activity. If you paid with a card, contact your card issuer. If you downloaded a file, delete it unopened and run a malware scan. Defenders should block the domain and its IP at DNS and proxy level and add it to watchlists while it remains live.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
5d164e7b06147e7b73bd94bc4a753cd8800567d7b64d4c0d072a3e6030e23223Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fort-skins.xyz · checked Oct 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
live_content→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source7/92 engine detections
View source2 community references
View sourcePD-20261006-610520
Page captured
View sourcefort-skins.xyz
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
fort-skins.xyz
PD-20261006-610520 Recipient: abuse@forticore.digital 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
fort-skins.xyz)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.