VirusTotal
5 / 95 engine detections
打开报告“home”
虚假空投: duplicate-disabled-7447.invalid — 内容不可用. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 5/95 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, SOCRadar, Webroot); PhishDestroy…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
5 / 95 engine detections
打开报告no community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain www.estatex.link was observed to resolve to the IPv4 address 198.54.132.28, which is registered to the autonomous system AS11878 operated by tzulo, inc. in Canada. The domain was registered on June 12, 2025 through Web Commerce Communications Limited and is served by four authoritative name servers (ns1‑ultahost.com through ns4‑ultahost.com). No TLS certificate was presented, indicating that the site was delivered over plain HTTP.
The web page returned a title tag containing the word “home”, but no further content has been captured because the site was taken offline before a full scrape could be performed. VirusTotal records show that five of ninety‑five scanning engines flagged the domain as malicious, consistent with its classification in the intelligence feeds as a “Fake Airdrop” campaign that impersonates Microsoft. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of zero out of one hundred, reinforcing the low reputation of the host. The domain appears on a single external blocklist and is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service, providing an additional layer of protection for downstream users.
The observed infrastructure suggests a short‑lived phishing operation that leverages brand impersonation to lure victims with a promise of an airdrop, a technique commonly used to harvest credentials or install malware. Because the site is currently offline, real‑time verification of the landing page is not possible, and the exact payload or credential‑collection mechanism remains unknown. Defenders should continue to monitor the IP address 198.54.132.28 for any re‑hosting activity, enforce outbound filtering for connections to the listed name servers, and ensure that corporate web‑proxy and DNS filtering solutions block the domain and its associated IP. Incident response teams that encounter related phishing attempts should treat any communication referencing Microsoft airdrops as suspicious and apply standard credential‑theft mitigation procedures.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.ultahost.comns2.ultahost.comns3.ultahost.comns4.ultahost.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-7447.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
duplicate-disabled-7447.invalid
5/95 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceduplicate-disabled-7447.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-7447.invalid)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.