VirusTotal
1 / 95 engine detections
打开报告“Hazefargo Credit Union – Simple $ Secure Payment”
冒充 Dhl: duplicate-disabled-6826.invalid — 内容不可用. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 1/95 (SOCRadar); PhishDestroy score 55/100. 注册商: OwnRegistrar.
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
1 / 95 engine detections
打开报告no community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
PhishDestroy identified www.bk.hazefargo.com as a brand impersonation threat targeting DHL. The domain presented a page titled 'Hazefargo Credit Union – Simple $ Secure Payment', a deceptive front for credential harvesting. Despite the low detection rate of 1 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, the domain was registered through OwnRegistrar, Inc. and resolved to IP address 192.3.190.187. The domain was created on August 08, 2025, and lacks an SSL certificate, further indicating malicious intent.
Technical indicators show that the domain appears on only one security blocklist, and Google Safe Browsing has not yet flagged it. The registrar and IP details point to a hosting environment commonly used for phishing. The combination of a newly created domain, missing HTTPS, and a generic page title impersonating a well-known brand like DHL underscores the fraudulent nature of the site.
The current status of the domain is offline, meaning the immediate threat has been neutralized. However, users should remain vigilant, as similar domains may reappear. PhishDestroy recommends verifying any unsolicited payment requests directly with DHL and avoiding entering credentials on unfamiliar sites. For ongoing protection, monitor PhishDestroy's threat database for related domains.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.webproserver.comdns2.webproserver.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-6826.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
duplicate-disabled-6826.invalid
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1/95 engine detections
View sourceduplicate-disabled-6826.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-6826.invalid)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.