The domain www.vavadavin.sbs was taken offline prior to the assessment date of July 24, 2026, but historical evidence indicates it was used for a generic phishing campaign. The site was registered on June 12, 2025 through Web Commerce Communications Limited and resolves to the IPv4 address 176.97.79.105, which belongs to ASN 58061 (Scalaxy B.V.) located in the Netherlands. DNS resolution is handled by Cloudflare name servers fish.ns.cloudflare.com and hasslo.ns.cloudflare.com, suggesting the infrastructure leveraged Cloudflare’s CDN and protection services. No TLS certificate was observed for the domain, indicating that traffic was served over plain HTTP, a common characteristic of low‑cost phishing deployments.
The page title returned by the server was "Games - VAVADA Online," providing no direct indication of the targeted brand or lure, and no further content analysis is available. VirusTotal scans show that four of ninety‑five antivirus or URL‑reputation engines flagged the domain, confirming that at least a subset of security products recognized it as malicious. The domain is listed on a single external blocklist and was actively blocked by the PhishDestroy mitigation service, reinforcing the consensus that the site was abusive.
Defenders should continue to block the domain at network perimeter and proxy layers, monitor for any re‑registration attempts, and consider adding the associated IP address 176.97.79.105 to reputation‑based deny lists. Because the site is no longer reachable, active content inspection is not possible, and the precise phishing payload or credential‑harvesting mechanism remains unknown. Ongoing vigilance is advised for any future domains that resolve to the same IP range or employ the same Cloudflare name servers, as the underlying hosting provider may be reused for similar campaigns.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 71/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://www.vavadavin.sbs/
Favicon Hash
ICANN OVERSIGHT
认证和 RAA 背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(MY)
