This domain is flagged as an elevated-risk phishing site targeting users through a fraudulent McDonald's survey scheme. Analysis indicates the site operates under the page title 'McDonald's Food Reviewer,' designed to deceive visitors into submitting personal or financial information under the guise of a legitimate rewards program. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered on June 07, 2026, through NAMECHEAP INC and resolves to the IP address 216.150.16.129. It is currently offline but was previously detected by 2 security blocklists, including PhishDestroy and OISD. The domain holds a Gridinsoft trust score of 0/100 and appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat intelligence pulses. VirusTotal reports 2 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious. Additional technical indicators include the use of Vercel hosting, HSTS implementation, and a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate. Mitigation steps for this specific threat type include blocking the domain and its associated IP at the network level. Users who may have interacted with the site should reset credentials for any accounts entered, particularly if reused across platforms. Organizations should update endpoint protection rules to detect similar phishing patterns, such as fake survey pages or reward-themed lures. Monitoring for related domains registered through the same registrar or resolving to the same IP range is recommended to preempt further abuse.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-228972.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(IS)
