VirusTotal
14 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“BltG0”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@cogentco.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 16 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
冒充 MetaMask: dai567.top — 未验证. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 14/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, Emsisoft, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLQuery 3 det.; 2 external…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
14 / 91 engine detections
打开报告3 det.
打开报告恶意
打开报告4 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
dai567.top is an impersonation phishing site aimed at crypto users. It poses as a legitimate service to win their trust. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-10-03. As of 2026-10-19 the domain's DNS was inactive, so the name no longer pointed visitors to the page, but the hosting server behind it still responded.
Impersonation pages copy the look of a service people already trust, such as a wallet, exchange or token project. They then ask the visitor for the access that the real service would never request: a seed phrase, a login and password, or a wallet connection and transaction signature. Whatever is handed over lets the operators take control of the account or move funds out of the wallet. The page title is the meaningless string "BltG0" and names no brand, while our analysis classifies the site as impersonation phishing.
Fourteen of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain on 2026-10-03. They include BitDefender, Kaspersky, Fortinet, Emsisoft, G-Data, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, CRDF and alphaMountain.ai. Detection from that many established vendors on the same day we found it points to an independent consensus. Beyond PhishDestroy, the domain appears on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists, which are maintained specifically to protect wallet users. It also features in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. on 2026-08-21, 43 days before it surfaced as phishing. That gap is consistent with names bought ahead of time and activated later. The site is hosted on SonderCloud Limited's network, a Hong Kong provider, with the server located in Japan. The disposable-looking name on a cheap .top domain fits an operation built to be discarded and replaced.
If you typed a seed phrase or private key on this site, treat that wallet as compromised. Move any remaining assets to a new wallet created on a clean device. If you connected a wallet and signed anything, review and revoke token approvals using a trusted approval-checking tool. If you entered a password, change it everywhere you reused it and turn on app-based 2FA. Security teams should block the domain at DNS and proxy level and add the hosting IP to watchlists, since the server is still live and could serve a new domain.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
a.share-dns.coma9.share-dns.comb.share-dns.netb9.share-dns.netLocation describes the IP network.
8a6f2ec6cd07f0d9f4e542063ab1357e34e063bb10a73f7b99301c79c9cf6e21dai56789.topwww.dai567.topwww.dai56789.topSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
www.dai567.topDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
可访问
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source14/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261003-CFDC4E
Page captured
View sourcedai567.top
View source已存储 79 个仿冒域名
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
dai567.top
PD-20261003-CFDC4E Recipient: abuse@cogentco.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
dai567.top)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.