Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
安全信号
Scamadviser Warnings1/100
This website does not have many visitors We found many low rated websites on the same server Several spammers and scammers use the same registrar This website has only been registered recently. We could not analyze the content of the site
According to the SSL check the certificate is valid
The domain cyberinvestigations.online was created on 15 October 2025 and is currently taken offline. Registration was processed by PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com, and the authoritative name servers are ns1.monovm.host and ns2.monovm.host. DNS resolution maps the domain to IP address 146.70.118.226, which belongs to AS9009 (M247 Europe SRL) and is geolocated in Germany. No TLS certificate is presented, indicating that the site does not offer encrypted HTTPS connections.
The page title returned from the host is "Cyber Investigations : Specialized Recovery Firm," which does not reference the targeted brand. The domain explicitly impersonates the financial brand Argent, and Scamadviser assigns a trust score of 1 / 100, classifying the activity as an investment scam. The domain is listed on a single security blocklist and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy. Malware and phishing detection services on VirusTotal flagged the domain in three out of ninety‑five scanners, and AlienVault OTX references the domain in one threat intelligence pulse.
These indicators collectively suggest a low‑cost impersonation campaign aimed at luring victims into fraudulent investment schemes. Uncertainty remains regarding the exact payload or phishing kit used, as no page content beyond the title has been captured and no SSL certificate limits further protocol‑level analysis. Defenders should continue to block the domain at perimeter filters, monitor DNS queries for the associated name servers, and add the IP address to host‑based deny lists. Additional telemetry such as web traffic logs and endpoint alerts should be reviewed for any attempts to contact this domain before it was taken offline.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月24日score 10/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttps://cyberinvestigations.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
认证和 RAA 背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非活动reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:11:42 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-09 04:44:11 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-09 04:44:11 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 4,187.51hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-05 10:29:33 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='cyberinvestigations.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConn
cyberinvestigations.online
已保存的结果
无法访问
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
AI辅助草稿——事件详细信息由AI提供商处理 · 自行审核并提交
After a phishing incident
针对受害者的建议与指导
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
我应该立即采取什么措施？
紧急
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
更改所有密码 — 电子邮件、Exchange 账户，以及任何使用同一密码的账户
启用双因素认证 使用身份验证器应用（而非短信）。禁用基于短信的恢复功能
冻结卡片 如果您在钓鱼网站上输入了银行信息
我应该为报告收集哪些信息？
联邦调查局（FBI）指南
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
How do phishing scams typically work?
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(IN)
