VirusTotal
14 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“Core Scientific”
钓鱼: coretific.online — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 14/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET); URLQuery 100 det.; URLScan…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
14 / 91 engine detections
打开报告100 det.
3/14
1/100
打开报告恶意
打开报告24 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告84/100
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
coretific.online is currently active and classified as a generic phishing site with a high risk rating. The domain was registered on June 17, 2025 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. and resolves to the IPv4 address 128.241.254.14, which belongs to AS213802 Tianfeng (Hong Kong) Communications Limited but is geolocated in the United States. HTTP requests return a 200 status code and the page title is reported as “Core Scientific”. The site presents a valid Let’s Encrypt certificate (R12) and advertises HSTS and HTTP/3 support, while its web stack includes Nginx and a Vue.js front‑end.
Reputation data shows a Gridinsoft trust score of 1 out of 100 and the domain appears on a single security blocklist; it is also listed as blocked by PhishDestroy. Threat intelligence indicates that the domain has been referenced in one AlienVault OTX pulse and 11 of 95 VirusTotal scanners have flagged it. The authoritative name servers are a.share-dns.com, a8.share-dns.com, b.share-dns.net and b8.share-dns.net. Analysis confirms that the domain is being used for phishing, but the specific credential‑capture mechanisms and targeted brands have not been disclosed in the available data.
The low trust score, detection by multiple vendors, and presence on blocklists suggest a high likelihood of malicious activity. Defenders should add 128.241.254.14 and the domain coretific.online to network and DNS block lists, enforce TLS inspection to capture potential credential submissions, and monitor for any outbound connections to the hosting AS. Continuous re‑scanning with VirusTotal and correlation with OTX feeds are recommended to capture any evolution in the payload or additional indicators of compromise.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
a.share-dns.coma8.share-dns.comb.share-dns.netb8.share-dns.netLocation describes the IP network.
d77508956ca14f62fe9fb8c35899cff695c60bf5f416d293e667927ef681058ccoretific.clubcoretific.comdeepcore-solutions.vipscientificbtc.comscientificbtc366.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of coretific.online · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=nginx
coretific.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
11→12
No threat flag
View source24 community references
View source14/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourcecoretific.online
View source由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2025年12月14日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
coretific.online)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.