VirusTotal
12 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“Centplay: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@centralnic.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 7 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
加密赌场诈骗: centplay.online — 可达 · 访问受限 (HTTP 403). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 12/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET); URLScan malicious…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
12 / 91 engine detections
打开报告Suspicious
打开报告恶意
打开报告no community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain centplay.online was registered on 21 February 2026 through Global Domain Group LLC and is hosted on the Cloudflare network (ASN 13335, United States). DNS resolution points to IP address 104.21.21.126, which is owned by Cloudflare, Inc. HTTP requests to the site return a 403 status code, and the TLS certificate presented is issued by Google Trust Services (WE1), indicating a valid SSL chain but not necessarily legitimate content. The site’s page title, "Centplay: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain," aligns with the observed scam type of a crypto‑focused phishing operation. Infrastructure analysis identifies the nameservers ivan.ns.cloudflare.com and lana.ns.cloudflare.com, both standard Cloudflare resolvers.
VirusTotal scans have recorded 14 detections out of 93 security vendors, and the domain appears on at least one external blocklist. PhishDestroy has already taken the site offline, and current monitoring confirms the domain is no longer serving content. The phishing kit associated with the campaign is classified as a Gambler Scam, which typically attempts to harvest credentials or financial information by masquerading as a cryptocurrency casino.
While the HTTP response and SSL details confirm the site’s infrastructure, the lack of live content limits deeper behavioral analysis. Defenders should immediately block centplay.online at network perimeter and DNS layers, add it to internal blocklists, and monitor for any derivative domains that reuse the same registrar or Cloudflare IP range. Ongoing threat‑intel feeds should be consulted for potential re‑hosting attempts, and any observed traffic to the listed IP should be investigated for credential‑stealing activity.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
lana.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
9eae7492ec6367997f7f123decaf63f4f6e16f22d43056ccb4a0c21c4a0dbb81Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
cloudflare_ban: raw=cf_phishing_block; http=403; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare; provider_error=cloudflare_phishing_interstitial
centplay.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
未知→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
未知→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
未知→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
未知→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
未知→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
未知→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
未知→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
未知→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不可用→可访问
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/cefa8081-b33f-4b71-8fa3-b4f2aa63a34e
可访问→不可用
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/143a2635-f4c0-492d-82e1-aa056eb92573
12/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePhishing Abuse Report: centplay[.]online
centplay.online
View source由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2026年2月18日
PD-1772505792-centplay.online Recipient: abuse@centralnic.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
centplay.online)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.