On July 22, 2026, analysis was performed for the domain caila.website. The site is presently offline, returning no HTTP content and lacking an SSL certificate, which eliminates encrypted traffic inspection. The domain was registered on July 11, 2025 through HOSTINGER operations, UAB and resolves to the IPv6 address 2a02:4780:84:9a66:7091:c583:ce3d:a198, hosted in Japan under ASN 47583 (Hostinger International Limited). The page title observed during the brief availability window was “Caila Official”, and the domain is classified as a crypto scam that impersonates the Telegram brand.
Security telemetry shows that one of ninety‑five VirusTotal scanners flagged the domain, indicating at least one vendor detected malicious behavior. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0 out of 100, and the domain appears on four independent blocklists (PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, Codeesura), confirming its reputation as a malicious resource. The malicious payload is identified as the Angel Drainer kit, a known cryptocurrency‑draining framework. The combination of a dedicated drainer kit, brand impersonation, and low trust scores suggests the domain was used to lure Telegram users into transferring cryptocurrency to attacker‑controlled wallets.
No further evidence such as phishing pages, credential harvesters, or additional infrastructure has been publicly disclosed, leaving the exact delivery method uncertain. Defenders should continue to block the IPv6 address and the domain at perimeter filters, update threat‑intel feeds with the observed indicators, and monitor for any re‑registration attempts or variations that reuse the Angel Drainer kit. Users of Telegram should be warned that any unsolicited requests referencing caila.website are likely fraudulent and should be ignored.
Extracted from stored page analysis
Observed indicators
0 wallet · 2 Telegram
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
扫描说明:unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='caila.website', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月23日score 15/1001 brand signal
IoC Extractionscanned 2026年8月3日0 wallet · 2 Telegram IoCs
Submitted URLhttps://caila.website/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
认证和 RAA 背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非活动reason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation未知Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-13 01:14:00 UTC
RDAP registration未知
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-19 16:19:47 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-19 16:19:47 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,471.92hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-10 04:17:21 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
This timeline displays historical security and status checkpoints observed by the PhishDestroy automated monitoring network. It records domain lifecycle updates, scanner changes, and threat telemetry over time.
12 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
A stored Cloudflare Radar report is available. The report link alone is not a malicious verdict and does not prove that every network field was captured.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
01Public scans & evidence collection10 sources and tool groups+
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
02Abuse reports & follow-upRegistrar, hosting and security channels+
Identify the responsible provider. Match registration and hosting records to the relevant abuse contact.
Prepare an evidence package. Include the URL, public scan references, captures and the recorded observations.
Send the report. Keep outgoing report records and recipient information when available.
Recheck and publish updates. Track later scanner verdicts, provider responses and site availability.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
您的加密货币交易所 — notify its fraud team immediately; it may be able to preserve records or restrict funds held on its platform
当地警方 — 即使无法立即采取行动，也能留下正式记录
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
加密货币诈骗通常是如何运作的？
虚假网站 — 与正规网站完全一致的克隆网站，仅域名略有改动
恶意批准 — “连接钱包”的提示会使攻击者获得无限的代币消费权限
猪的屠宰 — 通过Telegram/WhatsApp/交友软件花数周时间建立信任，随后钱被骗走
退款诈骗 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
(LT)
