VirusTotal
2 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“Bitslot: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain”
加密赌场诈骗: bitslot.digital — 内容不可用. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 2/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF); URLQuery 2 alerts; URLScan malicious verdict; 2 external blocklist matches…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
2 / 92 engine detections
打开报告2 threat-system alerts
打开报告3/14
恶意
打开报告checked — no match recorded
no community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hagezi Threat Feed | bitslot.digital |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| DNS4EU | bitslot.digital |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
PhishDestroy identifies bitslot.digital as an active crypto drainer domain designed to deceive users into connecting cryptocurrency wallets and authorizing unauthorized transactions. This domain mimics trusted brands to trick visitors into unknowingly signing malicious blockchain transactions, leading to direct fund theft. Security researchers report that crypto drainers are increasingly prevalent in 2024, with threat actors leveraging fake websites, social media impersonations, and malicious QR codes to distribute wallet-draining scripts. Users interacting with this domain risk irreversible financial losses, as drainer scripts automatically approve token transfer permissions that empty connected wallets without further user action. This domain was flagged on PhishDestroy with a VirusTotal detection rate of 2 out of 95 scanners at the time of initial analysis, indicating it remains under the radar of mainstream security tools. The domain uses a Google Trust Services SSL certificate to appear legitimate and operates with a recently registered status; registry data shows bitslot.digital was created within the last 60 days. Despite low antivirus coverage, the domain has been linked to multiple reports of wallet draining incidents targeting users in crypto forums and through fraudulent advertisements. The absence of detections highlights the need for proactive verification by end users and security analysts before engaging with unknown domains. If you visited bitslot.digital or entered wallet credentials, immediately disconnect your wallet from the site using your wallet’s interface. Revoke any suspicious token approvals via blockchain explorers such as Etherscan or Solscan, and transfer remaining assets to a new, isolated wallet. Report the incident to your wallet provider and file a complaint with local cybercrime units. Always verify unknown domains through PhishDestroy or similar threat intelligence platforms before entering sensitive information or connecting wallets. This domain is under active investigation—avoid interaction and share this advisory to warn others.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
paloma.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
714c88c0fd6a5c9cfe37a16263d1e98b0d9f2ac99b1843d87caadc46410db462Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of bitslot.digital · checked May 13, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='bitslot.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError
bitslot.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
2/92 engine detections
View source⚠️ ESCALATION #2 (478h active): Phishing - bitslot[.]digital
No threat flag
View sourcebitslot.digital
View source由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2026年5月13日
PD-20260513-571512 Recipient: abuse@identitydigital.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
bitslot.digital)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.