VirusTotal
14 / 92 engine detections
打开报告“Dietary Supplements for Protein, Energy,”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@rashost.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 7 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: betterdayscoshop.shop — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 200). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 14/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET); URLQuery 2 det.…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
14 / 92 engine detections
打开报告2 det.
打开报告DBL_SPAM
恶意
打开报告3 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
betterdayscoshop.shop is a fake online store posing as a dietary supplement retailer, with a page titled "Dietary Supplements for Protein, Energy,". It targets everyday shoppers looking for protein powders, energy products and similar health items. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-13, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still online with its storefront live.
The shop presents a supplement catalogue, usually at prices attractive enough to push a quick checkout. Buyers hand over their name, delivery address, email and payment card details, then pay for goods that never arrive, or arrive as cheap substitutes unrelated to the order. Victims lose the purchase amount, and the card data and personal details they typed in can be reused for further fraud or sold on.
Our classification is backed by several independent sources. On VirusTotal, 14 of 92 security engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-17, including BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, alphaMountain.ai, CyRadar and Chong Lua Dao. urlscan.io rated the site malicious and specifically identified it as a fake shop. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as spam, and it appears in 3 AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered on 2026-05-08 through Dynadot Inc., about five months before PhishDestroy detected it. A domain that sat for months before surfacing as a storefront is common with throwaway shop fronts on cheap TLDs like .shop. The site is hosted on the Malakmadze Web LLC network in Georgia (GE).
If you ordered from this site, contact your card issuer or bank right away, report the charge as fraud and ask for a chargeback. Request a replacement card if you entered card details, and watch your statements for unfamiliar charges. Be wary of follow-up emails about "delivery problems" or refunds, since the address you supplied may now be used for phishing. Defenders and payment teams should block the domain, add its indicators to their filters, and flag related transactions for review.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
chloe.ns.cloudflare.comphil.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
3173f1f44a9e514225e7e0167c1db4fe7f56e5936dc99a9a03d547607b0a980aSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
img.betterdayscoshop.shopDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of betterdayscoshop.shop · checked Oct 13, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy
betterdayscoshop.shop
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
未知→live_content
content_served
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
未知→live_content
content_served
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
未知→live_content
content_served
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
未知→live_content
content_served
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
未知→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source14/92 engine detections
View source3 community references
View sourcePD-20261013-85A8F2
Page captured
View sourcebetterdayscoshop.shop
View sourcePD-20261013-85A8F2 Recipient: abuse@rashost.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
betterdayscoshop.shop)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.