VirusTotal
14 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“Alphapgim.”
钓鱼: alphapgim.online — 内容不可用. 证据摘要: VirusTotal 14/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET); URLQuery 1 alert; Spamhaus DBL_SPAM…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
14 / 91 engine detections
打开报告1 threat-system alert
打开报告1/100
DBL_SPAM
4 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | alphapgim.online |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
alphapgim.online is an impersonation phishing site. It presented itself under the bare page title "Alphapgim." and copied the look of a legitimate service to win the trust of crypto users. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-08-19. The site has been offline since 2026-09-27, and at our last check on 2026-10-19 its DNS no longer resolved.
Impersonation pages borrow the branding, layout and tone of a service people already trust, so a visitor arriving from an ad, a direct message or a search result assumes they are on the real thing. The page then asks for something valuable, such as an account login, a recovery phrase, a deposit or a wallet connection. Whatever is entered goes straight to the operators. The "Alphapgim." title is a short, invented-looking name that sits close to a real brand without matching it exactly, a common way to slip past a quick glance. Victims typically lose account access, the funds behind that account, or control of a wallet.
On 2026-08-30, 14 of 91 VirusTotal engines marked the domain as malicious. The flagging vendors included alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet and G-Data. That spread of independent commercial and community engines points to a real threat rather than a single false positive. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL under the spam category, and it appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses alongside our own blocklist entry.
The domain was registered on 2026-03-26 through Global Domain Group LLC, roughly five months before we caught it. That gap suggests the domain was either aged on purpose or used quietly before drawing attention. It was hosted on the NEW DHAKA HARDWARE network in the United States. The site carried a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser said nothing about whether the operators could be trusted.
If you typed a password on this site, change it on the real service and on any account that reuses it, then turn on app-based two-factor authentication. If you entered a recovery phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and move the remaining funds to a newly created wallet right away. If you connected a wallet or signed anything, review and revoke token approvals with a reputable approval checker. If you sent money, report it to the service being imitated and to local law enforcement. Defenders should block the domain and its hosting IP, and search mail and proxy logs from 2026-08-19 onward for users who reached it.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.lytehosting.comdns2.lytehosting.comdns3.lytehosting.comdns4.lytehosting.comalphapgim.onlinepriority 0Location describes the IP network.
5ab6b0b4c5509910626feeb7cdd4f49f4d8df63d6e58196721045d54314e5ceealphapgim.online.fx-bluestone.onlinewww.alphapgim.online.fx-bluestone.onlineSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of alphapgim.online · checked Aug 20, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alphapgim.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
未知→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
可访问→不可用
14→15
14→Observation retained
可访问
14/91 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePD-20260819-FE244C
alphapgim.online
View sourcePage captured
View sourcePD-20260819-FE244C Recipient: abuse@whiteprivacy.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
alphapgim.online)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.