VirusTotal
10 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“Google”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@dynadot.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 7 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
冒充 Gmail: alloranetwork.community — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 301). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 10/91 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
10 / 91 engine detections
打开报告23 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain alloranetwork.community was observed as an offline site that attempted a Gmail brand impersonation. Registration data indicates the domain was provisioned through Cloudflare, Inc., with authoritative nameservers brenna.ns.cloudflare.com and hassan.ns.cloudflare.com. DNS resolution points to IP address 142.250.185.196, which belongs to AS15169 Google LLC located in the United States. The TLS certificate presented by the site is issued by Google Trust Services under the WE1 designation, suggesting the attacker leveraged a legitimate‑looking certificate to increase credibility. HTTP probing returned a 404 status code, and the page title reported by the server is "Google," consistent with the claimed brand target.
Infrastructure analysis shows the site employed Cloudflare services and HTTP/3, indicating the use of modern delivery mechanisms. The domain appears on a single security blocklist and has been actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service. Reputation scoring from Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 out of 100, reflecting a high likelihood of malicious intent. VirusTotal scans recorded six detections out of ninety‑five participating security vendors, reinforcing the suspicion of abuse.
While the site is currently offline, the combination of a Google‑issued certificate, the Gmail branding in the page title, and the low trust score suggest a deliberate attempt to harvest credentials or deliver malicious payloads under the guise of a Google service. Defenders should continue to monitor the domain for any re‑activation, enforce blocklists that include the associated IP and nameservers, and ensure that email security gateways flag any communications referencing the domain. Threat‑intel consumers are advised to treat any inbound traffic from this domain as malicious and to update detection signatures accordingly.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP 声誉不属于此域。
brenna.ns.cloudflare.comhassan.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
5e55f0d4da4fd848a758cc03c1af00a61052fb1f2065b3f58c27c25a9e0d8528Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_301; http=301; via=http_proxy; location=https://alloranetwork.community/; server=cloudflare
alloranetwork.community
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
不可用→可访问
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/28d2d06f-fef4-434b-b1fc-a9574ca936c1
可访问→不可用
No threat flag
View source23 community references
View source10/91 engine detections
View sourcePhishing Abuse Report: alloranetwork[.]community
Page captured
View sourcealloranetwork.community
View source由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2025年11月24日
PD-1774186924-alloranetwork.c Recipient: abuse@dynadot.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
alloranetwork.community)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.