VirusTotal
6 / 89 engine detections
打开报告“Allied Trade”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@rtmnetworks.net.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 2 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
钓鱼: alliedtrade.online — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 302). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 6/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft); URLQuery 1…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
6 / 89 engine detections
打开报告1 threat-system alert
打开报告4 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | alliedtrade.online |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of the domain alliedtrade.online indicates it is an active phishing threat as of July 27, 2026. The domain was registered on February 6, 2023, through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com, a registrar frequently associated with abusive registrations. It currently resolves to the IP address 86.107.77.238 and uses nameservers ns1.netlightsystems.com and ns2.netlightsystems.com, infrastructure that has been linked to previous phishing campaigns. Detection data from security vendors is limited but notable: one of 91 vendors on VirusTotal flags the domain as malicious, and it appears on at least one security blocklist, specifically PhishDestroy.
The domain remains active, with no evidence of takedown or suspension. The exact nature of the phishing content hosted on alliedtrade.online is not yet confirmed, as the page title and targeted brand have not been analyzed. However, the domain name suggests a focus on business or trade-related credentials, which aligns with common phishing tactics. Defenders should treat this domain as high-risk and consider blocking it at the network level.
Organizations using threat intelligence feeds may already have protections in place, given its presence on PhishDestroy’s blocklist. Further investigation into the hosting IP and nameserver history could reveal additional related domains, though such analysis is beyond the scope of this report. No SSL certificate details or HTTP response anomalies were provided, so transport-layer security cannot be assessed. Given the domain’s age and persistent activity, it is likely part of a broader, ongoing campaign rather than an isolated incident.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.netlightsystems.comns2.netlightsystems.comalliedtrade.onlinepriority 0Location describes the IP network.
4ab9a2df4b2382d9b9680336be246c97b683da52597653e031eb285ac4d1d9b7Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of alliedtrade.online · checked Jul 27, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_302; http=302; via=https_proxy; location=https://alliedtrade.online/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi; server=LiteSpeed
alliedtrade.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
live_content→redirected
http_redirect
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
可访问
4 community references
View source6/89 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260727-A1B9C3
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcealliedtrade.online
View source1 条社区报告
类别OTHER_INVESTMENT_SCAM
Data submited by Intelligence for good
PD-20260727-A1B9C3 Recipient: abuse@rtmnetworks.net 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
alliedtrade.online)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.