VirusTotal
11 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“ADA Markets - Cardano DEX Aggregator |”
冒充 Cardano: ada.markets — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 202). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 11/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker)…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
11 / 91 engine detections
打开报告24 community references
打开报告provider verdict: clean
打开报告96/100
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain ada.markets was a phishing site engaged in brand impersonation targeting users of the cryptocurrency platform 'across'. It posed as a Cardano DEX aggregator under the name 'ADA Markets' to deceive victims into disclosing sensitive information or transferring cryptocurrency. As of the latest verification, ada.markets has been taken offline, but it previously operated as an elevated-risk scam with no associated drainer kit identified.
Technical indicators confirm the domain's malicious intent. Ada.markets was flagged by 1 of 95 VirusTotal security vendors, including SOCRadar, and appeared on 1 security blocklist (PhishDestroy). It was registered through NameCheap, Inc. on August 2, 2023, and resolved to the IP address 35.214.172.8, hosted by Google LLC in the Netherlands. The SSL certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt (R12), and the observed page title was 'ADA Markets - Cardano DEX Aggregator |'. Nameservers were ns1.siteground.net and ns2.siteground.net, and Gridinsoft assigned it a trust score of 0/100.
Users who interacted with ada.markets should assume their credentials or cryptocurrency may be compromised. For cryptocurrency-related exposure, revoke all token approvals and transfer funds to a new wallet. For credential phishing, change passwords immediately, enable two-factor authentication, and monitor accounts for unauthorized activity. Report the domain to platforms like Google Safe Browsing, PhishTank, or local cybercrime authorities to aid in takedown efforts and prevent further victimization.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.siteground.netns2.siteground.netLocation describes the IP network.
12027fcb0f1caba66254925af8715d0f4288c9d481bfa383f61d56e73de2bd13Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of ada.markets · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_http: raw=http_202; http=202; via=https_direct; server=nginx
ada.markets
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
live_content→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
protected→live_content
content_served
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
protected→live_content
content_served
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→live_content
content_served
protected→live_content
content_served
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
live_content→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→live_content
content_served
protected→live_content
content_served
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→live_content
content_served
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
protected→live_content
content_served
未知→protected
http_access_restricted · access_restriction
audit_replace→https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/8e6ea28c-1f0c-41af-8804-d667e6d61194
No threat flag
View source24 community references
View source11/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceada.markets
View source由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2025年12月18日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
ada.markets)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.