VirusTotal
4 / 91 engine detections
打开报告“Social-store – Premium Social Media Accounts”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@whiteprivacy.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 7 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
凭据钓鱼: acelogstores.online — 最后已知的活跃状态 (HTTP 302). 证据摘要: VirusTotal 4/91 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft); URLQuery 1 alert…
为保留原始取证记录,下方的 PhishDestroy AI 详细分析仍使用英文。
4 / 91 engine detections
打开报告1 threat-system alert
打开报告Suspicious
打开报告1/13
14/100
打开报告DBL_SPAM
checked — no match recorded
24 community references
打开报告No threat flag
打开报告No malicious flag
打开报告Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | backend.princexchangeverify.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain acelogstores.online is a confirmed generic phishing site designed to steal user credentials through a fraudulent login interface. It does not impersonate a specific brand but presents itself as a vendor of 'Premium Social Media Accounts,' targeting victims with credential phishing tactics. As of the latest verification, acelogstores.online has been taken offline, though prior activity classified it as an elevated-risk threat.
Technical indicators confirm the malicious nature of acelogstores.online. The domain was flagged by 3 of 95 VirusTotal security vendors and appears on 1 security blocklist (PhishDestroy). Registered through Global Domain Group LLC on March 16, 2026, it resolved to the IP address 163.61.188.5, hosted in the US. The SSL certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt (R13), and the observed page title was 'Social-store – Premium Social Media Accounts.' Technologies detected include LiteSpeed and HTTP/3. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0/100, while Scamadviser rated it 14/100, further supporting its classification as a phishing domain.
Victims of acelogstores.online should immediately change passwords for any accounts accessed through the site, particularly social media or email credentials. Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on all sensitive accounts to prevent unauthorized access. Monitor financial and online accounts for suspicious activity, and report the phishing domain to platforms like Google Safe Browsing, PhishTank, or local cybersecurity authorities. If personal data was exposed, consider placing a fraud alert on credit reports.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns1.lytehosting.comdns2.lytehosting.comdns3.lytehosting.comdns4.lytehosting.comLocation describes the IP network.
11d032977802dd6891739707ebdf15064d63471923260cab27c28ba4abf25996aabnalfahatprd.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of acelogstores.online · checked Mar 20, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_302; http=302; via=https_proxy; location=https://acelogstores.online/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi; server=LiteSpeed
acelogstores.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
不可用→可访问
可访问→不可用
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→redirected
http_redirect
未知→inactive
http_no_content
未知→inactive
http_no_content
未知→inactive
http_no_content
未知→inactive
http_no_content
未知→inactive
http_no_content
未知→inactive
http_no_content
24 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source4/91 engine detections
View sourceacelogstores.online
View sourcePD-20260320-BE8C44
由 1 名社区成员报告;首次发现于 2026年3月20日
PD-20260320-BE8C44 Recipient: abuse@whiteprivacy.com 如果您输入了帐户凭据、个人或付款信息,或者从此域下载了文件,请立即采取措施。以下资源可帮助您报告事件并保护自己。
选择您所在的国家/地区以获取 官方网络犯罪联系人 或 创建投诉草稿 →。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
acelogstores.online)即使你并不了解所有细节—— 不管怎样都要提交报告. 即使信息不完整,对调查仍有帮助。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.