VirusTotal
5 / 91 engine detections
Raporu aç“Kraken Login”
Kraken taklidi: verify-1.online — İçerik kullanılamıyor. Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 5/91 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); Spamhaus…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
5 / 91 engine detections
Raporu açDBL_PHISH
no community references
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of verify-1.online indicates a newly created credential‑phishing infrastructure that is actively serving malicious content as of the report date, July 23, 2026. The domain was registered through Name.com, Inc. on July 22, 2026, suggesting a rapid launch timeline typical of opportunistic phishing campaigns. DNS resolution points to the IPv4 address 64.29.17.65, and the authoritative name servers are ns1.vercel-dns.com and ns2.vercel-dns.com, both of which are part of Vercel’s managed DNS service.
This hosting arrangement is commonly used for static web assets, but it also provides a low‑cost, quickly provisioned surface for malicious actors. The domain appears on one external security blocklist and has been explicitly blocked by the PhishDestroy filtering service, confirming that at least one reputable anti‑phishing vendor has identified it as malicious. VirusTotal data shows that 2 out of 91 security vendors have flagged the domain, reinforcing the suspicion despite the relatively low detection count.
No additional intelligence such as SSL certificate details, HTTP status codes, page titles, or brand targeting information is presently available, leaving the exact payload and victim‑lure tactics undefined. Defenders should prioritize immediate network‑level blocking of verify-1.online and its resolved IP address, incorporate the domain into URL filtering and DNS sinkhole policies, and monitor outbound connections for any attempts to contact the Vercel DNS infrastructure associated with this indicator. Continuous re‑evaluation is advised, as further analysis of the web content may reveal specific credential‑stealing forms or targeted brands, which would warrant more granular mitigation steps.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP itibarı bu etki alanıyla ilişkilendirilmez.
ns1.vercel-dns.comns2.vercel-dns.comLocation describes the IP network.
a9aabd247ffc9889eb5fcf135436c98a77a68478ceca97f1461427c9e31c21c2Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of verify-1.online · checked Jul 23, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
verify-1.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
5/91 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceverify-1.online
View sourcePage captured
View source114 kayıtlı benzer alan adı
114 kaydın 100 kadarı gösteriliyor
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
verify-1.online)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.