VirusTotal
3 / 89 engine detections
Raporu aç“Vote 0x39...4571 — pons”
Engel listesindeki alan adı: pons-voting-3i.netlify.app — İçerik kullanılamıyor (HTTP 404). Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 3/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
3 / 89 engine detections
Raporu açno community references
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
pons-voting-3i.netlify.app is an impersonation phishing page that posed as a voting portal for Pons. Its title, "Vote 0x39...4571 — pons", presented it as an on-chain proposal or delegate vote, which targets token holders and community members who expect governance links. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-15. It went offline on 2026-09-16, and as of 2026-10-19 the root returns no content.
Fake governance pages rely on urgency. A link circulates in chats or replies, claiming a vote is closing or that participation earns rewards. To cast a ballot, the visitor must connect a wallet and approve a request. Instead of a harmless vote signature, a page like this can ask for token approvals or signed permits that let the operator move assets. The truncated address in the title imitates a real proposal or delegate reference so that the request looks routine.
VirusTotal returned 3 detections out of 89 engines on 2026-09-17, from alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and VIPRE. That count is low, partly because the scan ran after the page had already gone dark. The stronger signal comes from wallet-focused blocklists. MetaMask and SEAL list the domain alongside PhishDestroy, so MetaMask users should see a warning if the page returns.
The page sat on a free Netlify subdomain, served from Amazon infrastructure in Germany. Throwaway platform subdomains like this cost nothing, deploy in seconds and are easy to abandon. That fits a page that lasted roughly a day after PhishDestroy spotted it. Its DigiCert certificate is Netlify's standard platform certificate, so the padlock says nothing about who operated the site.
If you connected a wallet here, check its token approvals and permit signatures with a reputable revocation tool. Revoke anything you do not recognise, and move remaining funds to a fresh wallet if you signed anything. Never vote through links shared in DMs or replies. Reach governance only through the project's official site or a verified voting platform. Defenders should block the domain, watch for sibling Netlify subdomains with similar "voting" names, and report new copies to Netlify and the wallet blocklists.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0x39dBED3a2bd333467115dE45665cC57F813C4571Format validated · Domain analysisIoC extraction recorded 2026-09-16 04:00:21 UTC
Last checked
Edge-IP itibarı bu etki alanıyla ilişkilendirilmez.
Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of pons-voting-3i.netlify.app · checked Sep 15, 2026
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
pons-voting-3i.netlify.app
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
0→3
Erişilebilir→Mevcut değil
No threat flag
View source3/89 engine detections
View sourcepons-voting-3i.netlify.app
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
pons-voting-3i.netlify.app)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.