VirusTotal
4 / 91 engine detections
Raporu aç“Leo”
Engel listesindeki alan adı: leocopilot.online — Bilinen son aktif (HTTP 200). Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 4/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, Gridinsoft…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
4 / 91 engine detections
Raporu açSuspicious
Raporu aç9/100
Raporu açchecked — no match recorded
24 community references
Raporu aç14 kontrol edildi — engelleme yok
No threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of leocopilot.online indicates active credential-harvesting phishing infrastructure as of July 12, 2026. The domain, registered on March 24, 2026, through a hosting provider, resolves to 104.21.86.22, a Cloudflare IP address located in Canada. Infrastructure analysis reveals Cloudflare nameservers (arnold.ns.cloudflare.com, meg.ns.cloudflare.com) and an SSL certificate issued by Let's Encrypt, suggesting a deliberate attempt to appear legitimate while masking the true origin. The domain is flagged by two security vendors and appears on one blocklist, with a trust score of 9/100 from independent assessment tools, reinforcing its classification as high-risk. The page title 'Leo' provides limited insight into the specific target or brand impersonation, though the domain name may suggest an attempt to mimic a legitimate service or platform. No confirmed phishing kit or brand association is currently identified in available intelligence. The HTTP 200 status confirms the site is operational, and Cloudflare Browser Insights detection implies active user interaction tracking. Defenders should treat this domain as an active threat, blocking resolution at the DNS level and monitoring for related indicators, including the IP address and nameserver pairings. Further analysis of captured payloads or user reports may clarify the exact phishing methodology or targeted entities.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP itibarı bu etki alanıyla ilişkilendirilmez.
meg.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
91bea1909e7471a2c302c848b4b870ee82015e3a47d95f9c30e238d2855dcfc0Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of leocopilot.online · checked Apr 22, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare
leocopilot.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
Bilinmiyor→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source24 community references
View source4/91 engine detections
View sourceleocopilot.online
View source1 topluluk üyesi tarafından bildirildi; ilk görülme 24.03.2026
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
leocopilot.online)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.