VirusTotal
21 / 95 engine detections
Raporu aç“Facebook – log in or sign up”
Facebook taklidi: g-mail.digital — İçerik kullanılamıyor. Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 21/95 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Certego, CRDF, CyRadar); URLQuery 100…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
21 / 95 engine detections
Raporu aç100 det.
Threat flag recorded
Raporu açZararlı
Raporu açchecked — no match recorded
17 community references
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
g-mail.digital is assessed as a high-risk domain for brand impersonation. This domain is designed to mimic Facebook, likely to deceive users into providing sensitive information such as login credentials or personal data. The risk level is high due to the domain's involvement in multiple threat intelligence reports and its current status of being flagged by security vendors.
Analysis indicates that g-mail.digital has been flagged in 17 threat intelligence pulses on AlienVault OTX, suggesting a significant level of malicious activity associated with the domain. VirusTotal reports that 21 out of 95 security vendors have flagged this domain, indicating a moderate level of consensus among security experts regarding its malicious nature. The domain is registered through Name.com, Inc and resolves to the IP address 16.16.167.230. It was created on November 30, 2025, which is a relatively recent date, often a common characteristic of malicious domains. Additionally, the domain appears on 2 security blocklists and lacks an SSL certificate, further raising concerns about its security and legitimacy. Google Safe Browsing has also flagged the domain for phishing, confirming the brand impersonation threat.
To mitigate the risk of brand impersonation associated with g-mail.digital, users should avoid clicking on any links or entering personal information on the site. Organizations should update their security policies to include this domain in their blocklists and educate employees about the dangers of brand impersonation attacks. Network administrators should monitor for any attempts to access this domain and implement DNS filtering to prevent access. Additionally, reporting the domain to the relevant brand (Facebook) and the domain registrar (Name.com, Inc) can help in taking further action to shut down the malicious activity and protect users.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1glr.name.comns2clp.name.comns3ghw.name.comns4cpw.name.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='g-mail.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError(
g-mail.digital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/d30b69bd-49b1-4967-8257-40caea10d28e
21/95 engine detections
View source17 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourceThreat flag recorded
View sourceg-mail.digital
View source1 topluluk üyesi tarafından bildirildi; ilk görülme 08.12.2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
g-mail.digital)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.