VirusTotal
5 / 89 engine detections
Raporu aç“Firelight”
Engel listesindeki alan adı: firelight.fi — İçerik kullanılamıyor. Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 5/89 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
5 / 89 engine detections
Raporu aç4 community references
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu aç80/100
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
firelight.fi presented itself under the name "Firelight" and operated as a crypto wallet drainer targeting cryptocurrency holders. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-09-17. The site went offline the following day, 2026-09-18, and remained dead as of the last check on 2026-10-19. Despite its short active window, it was flagged across multiple independent threat-intelligence platforms before going dark.
Wallet drainers lure victims into connecting their crypto wallets through a convincing web interface, then prompt them to sign transactions or grant token approvals that hand control of their assets to the attacker. Once approval is granted, the drainer contract silently sweeps tokens and NFTs from the victim's wallet without any further interaction required. The victim typically loses all approved assets within seconds of signing, with no way to reverse the transfer.
Five of 89 engines on VirusTotal flagged firelight.fi on 2026-09-17, with detections from ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, and VIPRE. The domain also appears on four OTX threat-intelligence pulses. It was added to the blocklists maintained by PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL, meaning active wallet software would have warned users before they could interact with the site.
The domain was registered on 2026-04-25 through 101Domain GRS Ltd. and sat dormant for nearly five months before becoming active. It was hosted on Cloudflare's network, resolving to an IP geolocated to Canada, and used a Let's Encrypt TLS certificate issued under the YE2 authority, a common low-cost setup that lends a false appearance of legitimacy.
If you visited firelight.fi and connected your wallet, immediately revoke all token approvals granted during that session using a trusted approval-management tool, then transfer remaining assets to a fresh wallet address. If you signed any transaction, assume those assets are lost and report the incident to your wallet provider. Defenders and security teams should ensure firelight.fi is present in their blocklists and distribute the domain to any threat-feed subscribers; the MetaMask and SEAL blocklist entries mean most major wallet interfaces already block it.
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
0x7bD6809f71a4CE08c4001baF8E89e3DB4E3C7fa6Format validated · Domain analysisIoC extraction recorded 2026-09-18 04:01:23 UTC
Last checked
Edge-IP itibarı bu etki alanıyla ilişkilendirilmez.
ernest.ns.cloudflare.comkatelyn.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
62b684ac87526387147125af2959697ae0931de9a6ae3f27f874ea329d99e687Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of firelight.fi · checked Sep 17, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
firelight.fi
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
Bilinmiyor→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
Erişilebilir→Mevcut değil
Erişilebilir
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source5/89 engine detections
View sourcefirelight.fi
View sourcePage captured
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
firelight.fi)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.