VirusTotal
5 / 89
BildirInterpretation & limits
Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
“ReLai”
Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →
No stored capture is available for this domain.
fgu.autos — Doğrulanmamış. Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 5/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar, VIPRE); PhishDestroy score 88/100. Kayıt kuruluşu: Dynadot.
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.
5 / 89
BildirEngine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
4 community references
BildirCommunity publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.
provider verdict: clean
A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
80/100
A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
Checked; no threat flag recorded
BildirA result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates.
fgu.autos returned HTTP status 200 in an HTTP check recorded on 2026-10-01, the most recent availability observation in this evidence set. The same domain was first observed on 2026-09-04, roughly four weeks earlier, according to the recorded first-observation date.
The HTTP check on 2026-10-01 recorded status 200 for fgu.autos, while the first observation of the domain is dated 2026-09-04. VirusTotal, checked on 2026-09-18, reported 5 detections across 89 scanners, and OTX, checked on 2026-09-14, listed 4 pulses. The PhishDestroy internal listing was recorded as true, and a PageSpeed check on 2026-09-14 produced a performance score of 96. The registrar is Dynadot Inc, and the SSL certificate issuer is Let's Encrypt / YR1, scanned on 2026-09-14.
The HTTP 200 record describes only the response captured on that date, not the domain's content or its present availability. The VirusTotal and OTX figures reflect separate source observations made on different dates, so they should be read as distinct records rather than combined into a single trend. The PhishDestroy listing and the PageSpeed score likewise come from different checks, and the chronology from first observation to the HTTP check spans several weeks without establishing what occurred in between.
Preserve the fgu.autos HTTP check record and the PhishDestroy listing entry as separate source records for later comparison. Compare the VirusTotal and OTX observations against future checks of fgu.autos, keeping each source's own record distinct. Retain the PageSpeed result alongside these records so that later measurements of fgu.autos can be reviewed against the same source set.
Bu ana bilgisayar için saklanmış tarayıcı-karşı-tarayıcı gözlemleri ile Keitaro tarzı trafik dağıtım sistemleri için gerçek zamanlı parmak izi kontrolü.
Tarayıcı notu: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='fgu.autos', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("SOCK
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns2.dyna-ns.netLocation describes the IP network.
bbb552bbd63227b525903a60e5b9da3ecc2340f93992d73e1c12c5bd6858ac6fbcf.autosbfe.latesd.autosfcv.autosgdb.autosghu.autoshdu.lathfs.latjfm.latjfu.latjgc.latkfh.autosmhx.latwhu.autosSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of fgu.autos · checked Sep 14, 2026
6 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
1 topluluk raporu
KategoriPIGBUTCHERING
I was contacted via telegram by someone claiming to work for a company that increased app views. When you viewed an app- you were paid 5-10$ per app. Then you had to complete a “node tasks “ with bitcoin in order to become a full time employee and receive your commissions. Upon c
“I was contacted via telegram by someone claiming to work for a company that increased app views. When you viewed an app- you were paid 5-10$ per app. Then you had to complete a “node tasks “ with bitcoin in order to become a full time employee and receive your commissions. Upon completing task 1 I sent $240 in bitcoin then was told I had to complete task 2 to cash out my original payment and that would cost $700 when I did that they said their financial department was closing and I had to wait u”
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin