VirusTotal
14 / 91 engine detections
Raporu aç“Call Girls In Hyderabad Escorts, ₹2500 Cash Payment Home Delivery Hyderabad Call Girls”
Analysis of the domain www.escortsunitha.com indicates a high-risk credential phishing campaign impersonating Google.
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
14 / 91 engine detections
Raporu açDBL_PHISH
1 community reference
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of the domain www.escortsunitha.com indicates a high-risk credential phishing campaign impersonating Google. The domain was registered on September 10, 2025, through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu and currently resolves to the IP address 145.79.211.164, hosted on AS47583 (Hostinger International Limited) in India. Infrastructure analysis reveals the use of nameservers ns1.dns-parking.com and ns2.dns-parking.com, alongside technologies such as Bootstrap, jsDelivr, jQuery, and Hostinger’s hosting platform, with HTTP/3 support. The SSL certificate is issued by Let’s Encrypt (R13), and the domain returns an HTTP 200 status, confirming active accessibility. The page title, 'Call Girls In Hyderabad Escorts, ₹2500 Cash Payment Home Delivery Hyderabad Call Girls,' does not align with the stated brand impersonation target (Google), suggesting either misdirection or a secondary layer of obfuscation. Detection data from threat intelligence sources indicates the domain is flagged by one security blocklist (PhishDestroy) and appears in a single AlienVault OTX pulse. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0/100, further corroborating its malicious classification. While VirusTotal reports 12 of 95 security vendors flagging the domain, the exact nature of the phishing mechanism remains unverified due to the absence of direct page analysis. Defenders should treat this domain as an active threat, particularly given its association with brand impersonation and credential phishing. Network-level blocking of the IP 145.79.211.164 and monitoring for related DNS resolutions (ns1.dns-parking.com, ns2.dns-parking.com) are recommended. The discrepancy between the page title and the alleged impersonation target warrants further investigation to determine the campaign’s full scope and intent.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.dns-parking.comns2.dns-parking.comLocation describes the IP network.
6a4a72fa9cdb0603400e966dbe005f89a7ba7d677b97195ed92ecb93693d9c1fescortsunitha.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-4661.invalid · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
status_split · unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-4661.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by Ne
duplicate-disabled-4661.invalid
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Erişilebilir→Mevcut değil
14/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1 community references
View sourceduplicate-disabled-4661.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-4661.invalid)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.