VirusTotal
2 / 91 engine detections
Raporu aç“McDonald's Food Reviewer”
Engel listesindeki alan adı: duplicate-disabled-228972.invalid — İçerik kullanılamıyor. Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 2/91 (Gridinsoft, SOCRadar); cloaking…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
2 / 91 engine detections
Raporu aç3/14
checked — no detections recorded
Raporu aç4 community references
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain is flagged as an elevated-risk phishing site targeting users through a fraudulent McDonald's survey scheme. Analysis indicates the site operates under the page title 'McDonald's Food Reviewer,' designed to deceive visitors into submitting personal or financial information under the guise of a legitimate rewards program. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered on June 07, 2026, through NAMECHEAP INC and resolves to the IP address 216.150.16.129. It is currently offline but was previously detected by 2 security blocklists, including PhishDestroy and OISD. The domain holds a Gridinsoft trust score of 0/100 and appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat intelligence pulses. VirusTotal reports 2 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious. Additional technical indicators include the use of Vercel hosting, HSTS implementation, and a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate. Mitigation steps for this specific threat type include blocking the domain and its associated IP at the network level. Users who may have interacted with the site should reset credentials for any accounts entered, particularly if reused across platforms. Organizations should update endpoint protection rules to detect similar phishing patterns, such as fake survey pages or reward-themed lures. Monitoring for related domains registered through the same registrar or resolving to the same IP range is recommended to preempt further abuse.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP itibarı bu etki alanıyla ilişkilendirilmez.
dns2.registrar-servers.comLocation describes the IP network.
d892c5e3eb84395dba9931fc8fd1734e1fc223e7b68cc1cdbb54ceeb8051be52Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of duplicate-disabled-228972.invalid · checked Jun 26, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
status_split · unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='duplicate-disabled-228972.invalid', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by
duplicate-disabled-228972.invalid
2/91 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View source4 community references
View sourceduplicate-disabled-228972.invalid
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
duplicate-disabled-228972.invalid)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.