VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
Raporu aç“BQC”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is complaint@gname.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
MetaMask taklidi: ddjys.one — Bilinen son aktif (HTTP 301). Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 6/91 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
6 / 91 engine detections
Raporu aç1 threat-system alert
Raporu açDBL_PHISH
5 community references
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS4EU | ddjys.one |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
ddjys.one is an impersonation phishing site whose page carries the title BQC. It poses as a legitimate crypto service to draw in wallet users and investors. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-09-15. As of 2026-10-19 the domain was still online and redirecting visitors, so it remains an active risk.
The page uses the BQC name to look like a real platform. Pages like this usually ask visitors to log in, connect a wallet, enter a recovery phrase or send a deposit. Anything typed into the page goes straight to the operators. A seed phrase or private key gives them full control of the wallet, and deposits sent to a fake platform are not returned. Because the domain now redirects, the link may lead to a different page than the one people first saw, while the same people run it.
Six of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain on 2026-09-25: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That rate is low, so many security tools will not warn users about this site. Stronger backing comes from the crypto-specific blocklists. MetaMask and SEAL both list it alongside PhishDestroy, and Spamhaus DBL classifies it as phishing. The domain also appears in five AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered on 2026-03-17 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd., about six months before PhishDestroy caught it. That long gap suggests it was registered early and held in reserve, or used quietly before anyone flagged it. Traffic passes through Cloudflare's network on an address in Canada, which hides the server that actually hosts the site. Its certificate is a standard automated Let's Encrypt one, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
Stop using the site and do not follow its redirect. If you entered a recovery phrase or private key, assume the wallet is compromised. Move any remaining funds to a new wallet created on a clean device. If you connected a wallet, review and revoke token approvals you do not recognise. If you reused a password there, change it everywhere and turn on two-factor authentication. Do not send further payments to anyone who promises to recover your funds. Defenders should block ddjys.one at DNS and proxy level, watch for lookalike BQC-branded domains, and report the site to Cloudflare and the registrar.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP itibarı bu etki alanıyla ilişkilendirilmez.
ollie.ns.cloudflare.comviddy.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
4183ca71ce8b5c86410b89d65c786beac2d3c26384ad602ce833c8bfcfbe3bc0Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of ddjys.one · checked Sep 15, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_301; http=301; via=https_proxy; location=https://ddjys.one/; server=cloudflare
ddjys.one
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
5 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source6/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260915-046EE4
Page captured
View sourceddjys.one
View source79 kayıtlı benzer alan adı
PD-20260915-046EE4 Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
ddjys.one)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.